Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: inlong who wrote (2771)	3/31/1999 7:20:00 PM
From: Gary Nash	Respond to of 5821

Inlong: It would be be very surprising if they didn 't hit in the holes since they are relying heavily on the down hole readings. They are simply following them to new targets. Am expecting them to start to reveal some continuity over a few hundred meters at least.

To: inlong who wrote (2771)	3/31/1999 10:49:00 PM
From: Brumell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5821

Thanks for pointing out the revised sections, inlong. They paint a very interesting picture and raise many questions. Apparently we have an island of mafic rock floating on a sea of paragneiss. Hole number 2 on section 12+00N clearly indicates this. The big question becomes is the mafic an intrusive into the gneiss or is the mafic a remnant of an older and larger body of mafic rock. Looking at section 11+00N, the sectioned mafic rock looks like the section through a ship lying on its side. Look where the high grade is thought to be deposited. Look at the estimated positions of the granite dikes. This is one very tricky piece of work with dramatic changes occurring in just 100 horizontal meters. I'm talking to some geo friends and hope to get their take late tonight. It's all too much for my simple mind. Hopefully you are right about hitting on L10+50 and L10+00. I think we are learning that anything can happen in 100 meters. Regards, Bob