SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RMF who wrote (10764)3/31/1999 10:49:00 PM
From: coug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25548
 
MICAP,

Just following the ongoing saga of MDIN on the HMMMMM and/or Rumor thread.. I agree with what you said about certain
people not understanding a JUNIOR EXPLORATION COMPANY or IMO trying
to throw out information for WHATEVER REASON???......HMMMMMMM...

Also on this front, the RUMOR was or somebody heard that silver was identified.. deeper in a hole... THESE GUYS are REALLY GOOD??? to do
that without assays..??? HMMMMMMM

Also read where water is a problem for drilling.. Pretty lame excuse
to suspend drilling if the results are SO GOOD, IMO. Heck I've had
water hauled by truck for 30 miles for small low profile drill programs..Not BIG TIME DEALS like this... Besides I read in one press release that they were near
"potable water" as if that made a difference in exploration

Anyway, good luck all and don't get HUMMMMMMMMED in your decisions..

The Coug



To: RMF who wrote (10764)3/31/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: Trader J  Respond to of 25548
 
Mining stocks, BB internet issues, discount store chains on the NYSE, or a deodorant company selling speed stick to the Nike sweatshops in Indonesia.... they all follow the same equations to ultimate success or failure.

Expect the dilution to continue as there is no way to stop it as long as progress is to be made. Our only hope will be in DDH 5 and 6. If the numbers can paint a pretty enough picture to entice a major, perhaps we can escape w/o further dilution.... but I would not count on it. I am expecting a JV and an expanision and continuance of the drill program.

Tj



To: RMF who wrote (10764)4/1/1999 12:12:00 AM
From: Trader J  Respond to of 25548
 
MICAP - But in answer to your question. "No", not mining....but exploration.

Message 7970802

I also find myself falling to the pessimistic side now. Being a trader by nature, I have found that it is ALWAYS best to remain objective about ANY holding, regardless of how close you may or may not be to the information coming out or the issue itself. I sold 25% of my position last week at .355 and have started trading MDIN. It is very predictable at these levels and I cannot ignore opportunity. I hate to create further liquidity here and play into the MM games, but learn to play and think like an MM to profit, or don't. It is really that simple.

I am still trying to remain positive about the long term as it appears that things are still looking good for a share price greater than today's value. But I cannot ignore the facts that thus far promises of the company have not materialized, results have not significantly moved the share price, and the market is rarely surprised.

It always seems to be "the next hole", or "the short squeeze", or "analyst coverage", or "fund buying", or "NDAs", or the analysis based on similar situations (i.e. ARP.V). Everyone is quick to point out the similarities but we seem to always ignore the glaring red flags. And the one thing that is always a constant in these penny plays are those that love to stick to their "numbers" or analysis in an effort to justify future value.

I no longer read many of the posts here and only trust a couple of people for my MDIN info. We must all remain objective and analyze this as if we were NOT a shareholder. It is not a pretty picture though if you analyze honestly and objectively.

I am pinning my hopes on one thing only, a low ball bid to take us out and potentially force a short squeeze of some magnitude. We must force that share accounting as that appears to be the only feasible way to get some high $$ out of this issue, save holes 5 and 6 proving up in a big way.

Just too many other things are not making sense and if this were any other situation I would have been gone long ago.

There is enough information here to write a book on penny stock pyschology though.

Still long on MDIN .... but only 75% long now.

Tj