SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (12071)3/31/1999 9:45:00 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13994
 
Isn't that a funny thing? On this thread, anything goes on BC(hey, i think he's scum). but, when Ronnie boy gets called into question, I'm biased. My proof is what i saw with my own eyes. My other proof was fished out of the FBI files under the freedom of information act(Ronnie narcing his own people in SAG). Check it out for yourself. Oh, did I forget to mention how he personally busted the Air Traffic Controllers? We're still suffering from that mistake.



To: jlallen who wrote (12071)3/31/1999 9:56:00 PM
From: Catfish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13994
 
Clinton's Legacy:WWIII and the New World Order?

FReeper Focus Forum
3/31/99 Copycat

The situation in Kosovo is puzzling to many observers. Why the President would choose to involve the United States in this conflict, now, at this time in history, in light of ancient prophecies, and with little national interest, has been the focus of many threads here lately. Why, indeed?

There is the possibility that this action is "wag the dog," a term now used as an adjective by politicos. This theory posits that clinton is engaging in this activity in an effort to dominate the "news of the day" with war stories, and as a result, to quell the rising tide of information becoming public regarding Chinagate. There is one, incontrovertable reason I do not subscribe to this notion. clinton already controls the media. They have acted in his interest for so long, I do not believe he fears them. Besides, in the end, bad press can be defeated by spin. There is no rewrite of history too diffucult for those willing to lie gratuitously.

Another possibility is that he is "legacy-building." Many believe that after having suffered the embarassment of impeachment and public exposure of his mysterious sexual procivities, clinton seeks some distinct mark to place on the ledger of history. That with one, bold stroke he believes he can balance the judgment of the ages in order to save his reputation. I wish it were so. But I do not believe. The man who lives by symbolism over substance, image over reality, would not be concerned with the judgement of history. THAT TOO, is vulnerable to spin.

No, I fear clinton has something much BIGGER in mind. I fear he is not following in the footsteps of JFK, but in the footsteps of Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. These Democratic Presidents have something in common. They both presided over a World War. Wilson during WWI, Roosevelt,...WWII. After each of these occurances, a common thread sprang forth. ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.

After WWI, Wilson put forth the idea of The League of Nations. He proposed the Fourteen Points which became the basis for the Treaty at Versailles. Wilson was invigorated by the idea of the League of Nations, but the idea fell short. The United States failed to join over opposition in the Senate.

As Democratic Vice-Presidential candidate in 1920, Franklin Delano Roosevelt campaigned, in vain, for Woodrow Wilson's League of Nations. Years later, during WWII, he moved to create a "grand alliance" against the Axis powers through "The Declaration of the United Nations", January 1, 1942, in which all nations fighting the Axis agreed not to make a separate peace and pledged themselves to a peace-keeping organization (now the United Nations) on victory.

Two World Wars, two attempts to create international government. And a challenge too inviting for Bill Clinton to refuse. In order to start events on their way to the World War he would need to implement his "third way," Bill Clinton needed Kosovo. He needed an entrance into a part of the world where a World War could be fought, but not won. And in the aftermath, the cry of "Never Again" that echoes back from previous conflicts would take hold in the hearts of the world's people, and the acceptance of a New World Government would find fetile ground. Thus the connection between today's events in Kosovo, a possible World War Three, and the establishment of the New World Order.

Consider this quote by H. G Wells in 1919, shortly after WWI, regarding the establishment of the League of Nations..."Under the lurid illumination of the world war, the idea of world-unification has passed rapidly from the sphere of the literary idealist into that of the methodical, practical man, and the task of an examination of its problems and possibilities, upon the scale which the near probability of an actual experiment demands, is thrust upon the world."

I believe in Bill Clinton's mind he WILL establish his legacy. He will succeed where Wilson and Roosevelt failed. He will precipate global conflict, and out of the ashes, the people of the world will CLAMOR for an end to nationalism. They will welcome the New World Order out of fear of war, and will surrender their freedom for the false hope of safety. Propecies fulfilled, Legacy intact.

freerepublic.com