Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (9909)	4/1/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: Thor Carlsen	Respond to of 14226

Richard, past or present share holders are welcome anytime to offer their 2 OPTs. I find this last bit rather exciting. Is it hype or not. If it is hype, I can imagine the lynching that will happen on this thread. I for one would have to be a witness to the hanging. On the other hand, let this press release come. If it is void of any scamology, i.e., "if, maybe, future, refine before, if, refine technique, if, some, many, could, would, should, etc.." than let us rejoice that a Dirt Play is actually going to make the bunch look all feasible. Let us pray, Thor My wedding band is only plated with the stuff and I am beginning to see the tin through it. Please God, bring us some shining metals!

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (9909)	4/1/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: Ed Fishbaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Richard As an ex Gpgi holder your views have to be assessed as influenced by your dissapointment in this company. I can imagine how you would feel if having sold your shares the GPGI shares rocket. I believe the post yesterday was in order to calm the concerns of shareholders because March 31st was promised as the day of news re Sabin. I am certaian that if yesterday passed without some news you would have been the first to scream that GPGI is a scam. Hold your fire, my sad friend, until you hear the Sabin results on Monday. I have some money to bet that it will be a positive surprise.I suggest that you reposition yourself in GPGI before it is too late. Ed

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (9909)	4/1/1999 8:31:00 PM
From: JACK R. SMITH JR.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Richard, "Start by reading the Thomas Report"--I have! The only values in the Thomas report which even come close to the values being reported are resident in the "reduced iron complexes". Thomas reported values in the $7000 per ton range at the time of the report. If they have been listening to me, then that is the part of the ore that they would attempt to extract first for immediate return. For the most part magnetically retrievable or by gravity methods. I would be most happy if they would "speak softly", but push a big orecart! Obtain results on a commercial scale and then announce the amount of the refiners check. However, we, the people expect to be informed, do we not? We push them to announce numbers and tell of the source of the ore! I think that they are responding to our demand in their way. Hopefully, they are planning to bring those numbers or an acceptable fraction of those to the table. Richard, I have said this before, and I will say it again. You are not to be hindered by your lack of shares here. You have interest in the general subject, and I will sit and listen to any negative comment that you post, and I encourage you to do so. If I ever hear a positive one, then I am outa here!! Sorta joking, kinda, Jack!