Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Madera International - Symbol WOOD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (1613)	4/1/1999 12:57:00 PM
From: antibash	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1979

I think John needs a reality check. anti

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (1613)	4/1/1999 1:14:00 PM
From: Dean Dumont	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1979

Gary, Why is it then, in the shareholders letter that went out, it stated the AUDITORS WERE WORKING DILIGENTLY. Then you come on SI and announce to the world it will be out on the 31st. Well, now the 31st rolls around and the company is now getting a new accounting firm and no audit. So, they file for the extension. As an AZNT shareholder I find this a little disturbing. The president of a company authorizing a letter to go out to shareholders and making all kinds of claims, but at the time of the letter being authored the 8K was reflecting a totally different story. So, who does AZNT lie to, the NASD, No, The S.E.C, NO, how about its shareholders, well.............. So, while you were defending that Letter, defending that the companies stance on its filings, did you know that Sylver was not going to get his filings in on time. You knew prior to the shareholders letter getting out the date of the K's? Did you know this too? So, here is the question, was that letter to the shareholders a farce or just a way to keep people at bay from calling the company and Demanding their shares? Now Gary, this is an easy question and is in no way ment to bring you to a boiling point OR ANYTHING TO RANT ABOUT. Just simple questions.

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (1613)	4/3/1999 9:15:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 1979

aznt 's 10k was signed off by the old auditor That's an outright lie, Spidey. Anyone interested can go have a look at the 10KSB for 1997 at Edgar. It was filed, waaaayyyyyy late, in November. It is not signed by any accountant, nor are the auditors who prepared it named. an 8k disclosed the reason for delay to the public & aznt filed with the sec for a two week extension. Sure did. What was that reason? Well... A change in auditors resulted in new auditors not being engaged until late March of 1999. Late engagement does not allow sufficient time for completion of the audit before the March 31, 1999 due date. freeedgar.com ITEM 4. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT. In February of 1999, Amazon Natural Treasures, Inc. ("the Company") decided to change auditors due to the fact that the prior auditor is still due compensation from the previous audit and would lack independence. The SEC and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants with regards to conducting an audit and issuing an audit report do not deem the prior auditors independent. The Company's management and financial direction set for the Company and its Shareholders have deemed the change of auditors to be an appropriate decision. freeedgar.com Interestingly, in a letter to the shareholders dated 12 March, CEO Mike Sylver stated categorically that the 1998 audit was "well underway"... magneticdiary.com magneticdiary.com