SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mani1 who wrote (53883)4/2/1999 2:32:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571399
 
Mani - RE: AMD designs

The K7 is getting good reviews, as a design. I beliveve that success in semiconductor manufacturing (making a decent profit) is determined by many variables.

Unfortunately for AMD, they have failed to demonstrate success (making a decent profit). No one knows the future, but I believe AMD will have to do a lot more than come out with one good CPU design to be successful, IMHO. Abeit, good designs certainly don't hurt.

As for Intel's design team(s), one could argue that maximizing design life is very cost effective. Haven't the K5, K6, and now K7 had / have / will have, 3 different cores in the same period when Intel has been selling the PPro core and it's variants? One could argue that the PPro is the most successful core of all time for CPU's, based on the above criteria (ability to make a sustained profit). If I were a designer of such a product, I don't believe I would be embarrassed.

Also, how did Intel get to have a market cap 100 times that of AMD while they have been in business the same amount of time? Could it be something fundamental to the way Intel approaches it's business?

Process Boy



To: Mani1 who wrote (53883)4/2/1999 9:32:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571399
 
Re: "Also INTC has 100 times the market cap of AMD while only 4 times the market share. Of course it is not really fair to compare the two like that since Intel has high ASP's, fat margins, strong balance sheet, ...

AMD arguably has a better design team than Intel, they are gaining market share and closing the performance gap. I guess it is all matter of perspective."

For some odd reason you forgot to mention profits.
No profits = No future.

EP