Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jonathan Sibley who wrote (9190)	4/2/1999 10:41:00 AM
From: John Schott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11149

Counting in QP2 Didn't someone post a clever answer to this within the last ten days or so? You might check back on this site or the OneList. Clearly you could print an incremented cariable in the report You can also watch the counter in the scan as it runs And there is always QPFS which should soon, it it doesn't let you do this.

To: Jonathan Sibley who wrote (9190)	4/3/1999 12:25:00 AM
From: Peter H. Mack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11149

What you are looking for is a global variable to use. unfortunately, the design of the scans are such that a global cant exist.. for example it would be nice to say... global_integer c1, c2, c3; if close(0) > 0 then c1 := c1+1; ...................... While I am at it.. Has anyone tried to use the NOT operator?? I can't get it to work even when typing in the example verbatum.. Using the Not operator is actually a work around because I really needed to use the <> not equal relational operator that most languages include. if open(0) <> close(0) then....// this excludes issues that didnt trade... regards pete regards pete