Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : RealNetworks (NASDAQ:RNWK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stock_bull69 who wrote (2225)	4/2/1999 6:15:00 PM
From: BomboochaBoy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5843

statements re over valuation will succeed in a mass panic is hilarious! There is a lot of money to be made on both the long and short sides. I like shorters. They keep the stock liquid and help with the short-term 25-point ramps. I really like Real for the long term, so the shorts are more informative and entertaining to me than anything. That being said, I think some shorters who aren't technically or fundamentally sound are better off betting against the L.A. Clippers or Florida Marlins. Just my $.02.

To: stock_bull69 who wrote (2225)	4/3/1999 4:45:00 AM
From: B. A. Marlow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5843

We're an "equal opportunity employer," 49er. Shorts welcome. We'll know we're due for a melt-up as soon as Auric Goldfinger shows up! He thought GNET was overpriced at $100, pre-split (that's 80+ points ago!). Tried his best to spook lurkers but got fried. Geez, there must be an easier way to make a living! Unlike most shorts, though, Auric had the graciousness to admit defeat. (He might have even gone long.) For that, he earns our respect. So, yes, RNWK is a great short candidate. As usual, it's way "overpriced." So were GNET and BCST! BAM