Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : FLAME THREAD - Post all obnoxious/derogatory comments here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Druss who wrote (6561)	4/3/1999 5:05:00 PM
From: Larry Voyles	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12754

Now are you going to start claiming someone hired you? Remember that kid in P.E. that always got picked last, 'cause he was positively awful at sports? Well, I'm like that kid. Everybody else in the great State of Georgia that knows COBOL already had a job. They offered me way too much money to "analyze and remediate" code. It sounded like one of those nebulous job descriptions where I could browse porno sites on the web all day and call it "research".

To: Druss who wrote (6561)	4/3/1999 6:55:00 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12754

Solon has had certain problems with unjustified accusations of embezzlement on his last eight jobs and that has somewhat limited his demand on the job market at least until he has his name cleared in the upcoming trials Thank you, Druss. The accusations were indeed unjustified. It was company money, and I was part of the company. Their logic is stone-age. The courts will see that common rationality prevails, and that employee initiative is properly recognized as a virtue. I have never forgotten the lessons you taught me: that God put wealth on this earth for all of us...not just for all of them. I am spending a pretty penny on these gals that I have sent to negotiate with the trial judges. Funny damn thing when you gotta buy your freedom. Doesn't anything belong to me?? It was good to see Lee win his indecent exposure case, by proving to the trial judge that there was no evidence that could be offered to show that there was an alternative exposure available to him, without at the same time running the risk of being accused of concealing one's identity...which is probably not right either...