Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RockyBalboa who wrote (13018)	4/3/1999 5:03:00 AM
From: JW Steve	Respond to of 27722

I never said a word about Anthony. I don't believe he had anything to do with the movement of this stock. I think the fact that a lot of people got burned at 27 way back when, there are a lot of weak hands. It also makes it easier for people to come in and badmouth the stock. I heard the same stuff about DBCC. It just gets old when you've expressed your opinion many times over and continue to badger people. Hey, it's a free country, feel free. Just don't expect me to sit by and smile blissfully. jw steve

To: RockyBalboa who wrote (13018)	4/3/1999 2:57:00 PM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27722

Hi Christian! Stiring the pot I see. BTW here's a summary on short interest: 03/99 345,082 1,220,795 0.28 02/99 460,927 2,263,453 0.20 01/99 1,435,265 3,383,874 0.42 12/98 1,993,196 6,306,378 0.32 11/98 1,319,578 487,580 2.71 10/98 1,295,770 179,174 7.23 I think NAVR probably would have hit 10 before it's recent resurgance had it not been for the short covering that has occured (The shorts have held up NAVR offsetting the inside sales that have occured). All that said NAVR should be a fun ride up to the eve of the spin at which point it'll be toss a few back and buckle up for the rollercoaster. Mad2