SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Investor-ex! who wrote (5215)4/3/1999 12:37:00 AM
From: C.K. Houston  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 9818
 
<PENCIL! This is SO funny!>

What's even funnier is that some who peruse this thread - are gonna be frantically searching for the company that has this new technology ...

"Wall Street is lining up behind the manufacture of this [Y2K] breakthrough and the federal government has begun talks with the inventor to acquire this new process and implement it on all 70,000+ mission-critical and non-mission-critical systems."

Periodic
Error
Nullification, and
Corrective
Instrument
Logic

Just like FBN's April Fool's joke last year:-)) It was hilarious. I couldn't believe how many people were calling up (and getting mad at) their brokerage firms, trying to buy shares in a non-existent company.

KEN: Great post.

Cheryl
============================================================

Wish this were an April Fool's joke. Unfortunately, it isn't.

OHIO BOY STOPPED FROM Y2K SOLVING

MAYFIELD, Ohio, March 30 (UPI) - An 11-year-old boy hired this month by an Ohio school system to make its computers Y2K compliant, will not be allowed to complete his task. The state Bureau of Employment Services says (Tuesday) that, except for certain jobs, children must have permits to work in Ohio and work permits for an 11-year-old can't be issued while school is in session.

Copyright 1999 by United Press International
vny.com

The article was published in the Ashtabula, Ohio Star-Beacon about a week ago.



To: Investor-ex! who wrote (5215)4/3/1999 3:13:00 AM
From: Ken  Respond to of 9818
 
<PENCIL! This is SO funny!> Yep! Roleigh has worked so hard and pumped out so much excellent information, he was sure deserving of some laughs!

But, some of you who know Roleigh may have missed something in
his story!

He has long and emphatically stated that 'there won't be a silver
bullet!', so for him to immediately endorse a 'silver bullet' story, just because he saw a brief story about one ----well, he probably got another big laugh out of some thinking he would buy that one so blindly!