Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (3101)	4/3/1999 6:10:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 3744

OPEN LETTER TO SLOBODAN MILOSEVJIK Ahem, sir. Ok. Nice war, so far. Very righteous. It is your Yugoslavia by democratic majority. But. A safe environment for the majority is assured without further repudiation of these minorities. The outcome of the war will not be good for either side. For no foreseeable future within Kosovo allow Serbia be allowed a happy administration of this state. Perhaps it is time to negotiate a settlement. One outstanding feature of the past conflicts has been the emphasis on alleged retaliation against noncombatants. It is not easy to justify if it is true. Whatever territorial limits Serbia can live with, it should attempt to do so now and try to repair its relations with western countries. This is not a trivial matter and will take some time. It is in the best interests of the future of Serbia. The containment of Muslim ambition within Europe, our country would have us believe is a non-issue. But with Turkey and Iraq, we can see it is surely not always benign. However as weak as the west has been to control these things in the past, I feel it is true that your nation is not in any danger of direct attack by any such encroaching neighbour. If the present perception of repression continues this may not be always the case. EC<:-}

To: E. Charters who wrote (3101)	4/3/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: John Ripley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

EC, Thanks for your well informed comments. I respect your expertise. Just thought you may be interested to see the beaurocrat's position. I'm no longer involved in the HABE stock,(inventor of cheaper, more effective, non-toxic gold leach product) sold out with a 150% profit, could have held on for 600% but crystal ball was too murky that day. Happy Easter, roast Bunny tomorrow? RIP

To: E. Charters who wrote (3101)	4/9/1999 1:11:00 AM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3744

Hello Eric or The Truth the world according to .... First, my compliments The post I just read couldn't have been clearer. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in Sudbury, Ontario. Sudbury, the Big Nickel, an hour and fifteen from North Bay. As kids we always liked heading the other way, up to Kip. The only good thing about Sudbury was the ice cream at Sturgeon Falls and and the Grandparents house on Roxborough, I won't tell you what number. <g> My cousin lived in Copper Cliff, as close a she could get to the stack. Got it cheap too, times are a changing. I can picture the guy you just said to call, his name would be Alphonse Laboucane and he would read from carefully prepared statements that had the official seal on the properly coloured stationery. I was just talking to Barbie on the FNTT thread, don't worry, you ain't interested in that stock, and thought this would be an appropriate place to ask you for some reflections on Crystallex. Any thoughts.

To: E. Charters who wrote (3101)	4/12/1999 2:01:00 PM
From: richard badauskas	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3744

I thought that the real environmental problem comes from acid mine water discharge. This problem becomes very serious when large quantities of sulphide rock are bought to the surface. The broken sulphide rock which is highly acidic, leaches the acid when it comes into contact with water. The highly acidic run-off then leaches metals from surrounding rocks and deposits this poisonous mix into watercourses where it destroys all forms of animal and plant life. Old mine sites that are covered in tailings dumps, open cuts and old shafts are the culprits. I understand that Canada has a major problem with this type of pollution. I think the greenies probably confuse the two types of pollution, for example cyanide has an immediate effect on aquaculture, where very small quantities in the water will kill all the fish (until the cyanide is gone). The acid mine water discharge stays to pollute forever. What are the Canadians doing to address the problem of acid mine water pollution?