Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : RealNetworks (NASDAQ:RNWK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: B. A. Marlow who wrote (2285)	4/3/1999 3:03:00 PM
From: Franco Forghieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5843

What about using RNWK for auction??? (Christie, ebay, etc). I mean... live auction !!! I seat on the riverside with my RNWK and wait for 220 to pass in front of me!! And .... I sleep well. Franco

To: B. A. Marlow who wrote (2285)	4/3/1999 3:18:00 PM
From: RTev	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5843

His take on RNWK is that AOL needs it; if it passes, ATHM's on deck. AOL might need RNWK, but RNWK needs to stay away from AOL. The only way AOL could get hold of RNWK is through a hostile takeover attempt which would not work on a company where only 10% of the stock is available on the market. What AOL really needs is a broadband strategy that's more than vapor. So far, they don't have it. Each month, thousands more people connect to the net through DSL using ISPs other than AOL since AOL offers only press releases and agreements for service "real soon now". Thousands more connect through cable modems. Satellite and broadband wireless on on the horizon (both literally and figuratively). AOL is not a part of any of it. RNWK is very much a part of it all. RNWK benefits from the rapid expansion of broadband. AOL benefits by slowing it down with the help of their armies of lawyers, publicists, and lobbyists. RNWK benefits from an open and diverse internet. AOL benefits from a closed and and proprietary network. The companies just simply do not fit well together.

To: B. A. Marlow who wrote (2285)	4/3/1999 4:25:00 PM
From: LLCoolG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5843

OT Yeah, anyone knew that BSCT was going to be taken. Harmon was no earlier in that assumption that Calandra or anyone else. Harmon was "#1" last year because nobody else was there. The same reason that Ryan Jacob did anything--any contrarian who played the Internet stocks before September looked like a genius, because anyone invested in them did well. Harmon is a paid shill. He has degraded to a very low level the past few months, no different than anyone from a major house. He will act in his self-interest, and is now using his "credibility" to further his own aims as opposed to objectivity and truth. G