Now on this one the problem is blamed on lack of sex by Billie...I hope someone sneaks in Monica into the White House when Hillary takes off in another trip again!<VBG>
The day after President Clinton ordered airstrikes on Yugoslav targets, Serbian protesters took to the streets.
"Go Back to Monica," some of them chanted, in defiance of the U.S. war machine and the president who turned it against them.
The insults were an expression of blind Serbian rage, not the product of any well-thought-out analysis about the motives behind the man who had just ordered B-2 stealth bombers into their backyard. It's even doubtful those demonstrators had considered the fact that in just the last seven months Clinton has launched air attacks on four sovereign nations -- an unprecedented collection of random military assaults against enemies real and imagined.
On Aug. 20 of last year, just three days after Clinton told the nation he had lied about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, the cruise missiles flew into Afghanistan and Sudan. The "emerging national security threat" touted by the White House press office that day turned out to be, in part, a Sudanese aspirin factory.
Then came the Impeachment War, declared in December against Iraq on the eve of the House Monicagate vote, which ended at almost the precise moment the Clinton indictment was handed up.
And now the United States is at war with Slobodan Milosevic, the Serbian strongman known stateside as "the Balkan Butcher," whose years-long campaign of ethnic cleansing is said to be responsible for 250,000 Yugoslav deaths.
The first two military adventures were widely perceived as attempts by the White House to distract the nation's attention from Clinton's scandal woes. And, while many suspect the same thing may be happening now, there are puzzling differences that beg the question: Why has our peacemaker president suddenly become the most prolific military aggressor since Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman burned his way through the Civil War South?
On the eve of ancient battles, Roman generals forbade sexual activity among the troops to keep their aggression levels up. Could it be that a Monica-deprived president, denied the physical release she and others in the rumored White House harem once provided, has traded cruising interns for cruise missiles?
It's a bizarre motivational theory, to be sure. But, on the other hand, where in this latest miniwar are the political payoffs that make almost every act of Clintonian "statesmanship" so transparent?
Our Balkan bombardment is hardly more popular at home than it is abroad. There's no longer any need to distract from impeachment. Post-Senate-trial media interest in even a credible rape allegation against Clinton has been muted at best. And, short of World War III, the Chinagate espionage scandal isn't going away anytime soon.
Having slipped the impeachment noose and slithered away from the latest charge of sexual assault, perhaps Hillary, or Al Gore, or nervous Democrats on the Hill have finally put their foot down. If one more high heel tumbles out of Bubba's closet, he may be on his own -- all the way back to Little Rock.
Consider, as well, that at this point in the Clinton marriage, monogamy is probably not a very attractive option for either spouse. And so the man who, according to Monica Lewinsky and others, has gone through literally hundreds of women over the years, may be down to a sexual starvation diet.
Picture a smoker with a 30-year, four-pack-a-day habit trying to quit cold turkey while coping with the pressures of the presidency, and you may have an explanation for why we're suddenly bombing the daylights out of everybody in sight. Call it cigar-sex withdrawal.
NewsMax.com put this theory to Dr. Paul Fick, noted psychologist and author of 1995's all-too-prescient mega-selling book The Dysfunctional President.
"In the president's case, my whole contention has been that as a result of his childhood he developed a tremendous amount of anger," Fick explained. "On the one hand, he had the need to overachieve, and on the other he had the need, because of his anger, to self-destruct. He developed a sexual compulsion at a relatively young age as a way to avoid the emotional problems and all the hostility that was taking place in his home."
The turmoil of Clinton's boyhood emanated from his alcoholic stepfather, Roger Clinton Sr., who verbally and physically abused Clinton's mother. Young Bill was the prototypical "good son" who worked hard to put a normal veneer on a shaky family life that featured several visits from the police and an on-again, off-again divorce.
Once, while in his teens, the boy who would be president actually threatened to beat up his stepfather if he didn't stop hitting his mother.
Clinton's sexual compulsion became central to his "coping strategy," says Fick. "And if somebody is deprived of their coping strategy -- and if they do not develop another way to handle things through therapy or something else -- obviously their anger is going to escalate, because the whole intent of the compulsion is to quell the anger."
But has that anger seeped into public-policy-making decisions like waging war on Serbia? Fick doesn't think so, but not because Clinton has found a different way of coping:
"I don't believe he ever stopped acting out his sexual compulsion," Fick says, "and there's no evidence he's sought therapeutic help. Granted, this is just my suspicion. But when I first wrote The Dysfunctional President, I suggested he was going to do what he did with Lewinsky and people thought I was absolutely wacko to predict he would do that. But he did."
Oddly enough, Fick's suspicion was echoed recently by none other than Linda Tripp, whose tape recorder helped prove Fick right about his Monicagate premonition. Tripp concluded a February interview with CNN's Larry King by noting that "I have reason to believe the behavior is still ongoing."
King failed to follow up. But Tripp left no doubt that the behavior in question was post-Monica White House womanizing.
Fick suggested another possible link between our Kosovo adventure and Clinton's troubled boyhood:
"The genesis of Clinton's problem is his experience as an adult child of an alcoholic. He grew up in this violent alcoholic home with the stepfather, and he has never resolved that problem. He has a tremendous amount of rage against that person who is an elder alcoholic. And Boris Yeltsin, an elder alcoholic in Russia, may subconsciously remind him of that."
The Russian president, a notoriously heavy drinker, has reacted harshly to U.S. airstrikes on Yugoslavia. Yeltsin has reportedly readied theater tactical nukes and made public comments hinting at World War III. Many believe Clinton's war on Serbia, a longtime Russian ally, isn't worth the risks to worldwide stability.
It's impossible to gauge how much Clinton's sexual-addiction coping strategy or the traumas of his abusive childhood factor into presidential decision-making. Still, as Fick notes in his book, the president himself has linked some of his White House behavior to old psychological wounds.
In a November 1995 interview with Good Housekeeping magazine, Clinton told interviewer Nancy Collins:
"The violence and dysfunction in our home made me a loner, which is contrary to the way people view me, because I'm gregarious, happy, all of that. But I had to construct a whole life inside my own mind, my own space.
"When you grow up in a disruptive home, inadvertently you send mixed signals to people. You learn that other people, in the outside world, didn't live in this same context as you. I see this as president."
Then, in an amazing admission, Clinton described how the habits born of his own dysfunctional background actually impacted on U.S. military strategy:
"When you are president, and go the extra mile, others will interpret it as weakness. In Haiti, I pretty much had to invade the country because people didn't believe me. When I finally had the planes in the air, they believed me and got out of there. That's happened all my life from the time I was in school. People underestimate your resolve because you go out of your way to accommodate them before you drop the hammer."
Clinton's bluff over the skies of Haiti worked in 1994. But five years later, even carrying out the threat of military action hasn't deterred Slobodan Milosevic. Despite the heaviest European bombardment since World War II, the "Butcher of the Balkans" shows no sign of backing down.
In a revealing comment on his own development, Clinton told Collins, "I grew up as a peacemaker, always trying to minimize disruption."
Does Clinton now see himself as global peacemaker in a world resembling the chaotic home of his youth, with Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosevic and Boris Yeltsin playing the role of his own violent stepfather? What happens when they fail to yield as Roger Clinton Sr. did when young Clinton threatened to strike back? And has the president's own failure to seek psychological help left him without a workable post-Monica coping strategy?
As country after country finds itself targeted by U.S. military might, those are questions that Americans may well want to ponder.
|