SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kidl who wrote (17531)4/3/1999 11:56:00 PM
From: Rocket Red  Respond to of 26850
 
Kid1
Dr.Bob's Theory is very much Alive and His Tonnage targets are coming to a head.He has already said 40 mil Tons plus and growing to his target of well over 100 mil Tons at Snap Lake without any feeder or feeders.

Cheers.



To: kidl who wrote (17531)4/4/1999 1:49:00 AM
From: teevee  Respond to of 26850
 
kidl,
Lets see now....a diameter of 4600 meters eh....that means a radius of 2300 meters. If we use an average thickness of 2.5 meters and a density of 2.5, and calcultate the area as (pi)(radius)(radius)=3.14 x 2300m x 2300m x 2.5m x 2.5tonnes/cubic meter=103 million tonnes.....nice to see the sceptic, jspec, has finally come around from the posts from last November and December which also called for this amount of tonnage.
regards,
teevee


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News