Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: REW who wrote (23728)	4/4/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Bob, I have spent already more time than I planned on TSIG, one gets dragged into these things. I was under the impression that Gordon current salary is no $360,000 and was so last year. I also believe that the grant of 5 MM share is not a future grant but an immediate grant. Last, the total (including Gordon's 5 MM shares) of 34 MM shares in grants and exercised option last year is already a fact not a planned expansion. This "grabbing" by insiders of the company equity (and what else would you call dilution of the public by 55%, and more to come with another 19 MM options granted last year?. I just do not have the time to go through each one of the "possible" expansion plans like I did with the 50 MM school children case. When I find one hyped number, I assume the rest is hyped as well. When I find one example of the public being robbed of its ownership of the company, I do not even look at the plans. You people all the time ask that I respond to your posts, yesterday I did my best to rapidly find information, some of it must be flawed and I apologize for it. Buit it would be nice if you come forward and said, yes a company that had sales of about a million and losses of about $12 MM should compensate it chief executive with $360,000 per year and 5 MM shares, and his teams with roughly 50% of the company assets. That is a travesty and a strong sign that management takes care of itself first the poublic share holders, never. I have addressed to you this issue three time and you always shy from responding to it. I must assume that you believe ronbbing the public is "fair game". I would siuggest that each holder looks seriously at the issue of corporate banditery and decides if all the dreams are worth finding newxt year that they have been diluted by another factor of 2 (and with the current floorless and the additional 20 MM options, you are well on your way). Good luck to all of you, but I fear very much that the due dili is more what was fed to people by corporate IR and accepted as fact. The floorless is probably just the first instance, and more delusion and dilution will follow. Zeev

To: REW who wrote (23728)	4/4/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: ztect	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 44908

REW.... Just read a response to your's that either is purposely trying to mislead or is written by a person who can't read.... The recent 10-k clearly said that Gordon's salary for last year was $178,000 and NOT $360,000.....The 10k also clearly stated that the CEO compensation was for the next five years...same with the shares. Consequently the whole argument that he was over compensated relative to last year's 10-k based on his future salary is pretty pointless... The increased compensation is actually a reflection of future prospects of the company which have improved dramatically this quarter based on agreements already in place. His compensation for last year was not out of line with executive compensation packages for similar companies. His future compensation package is not out of line with the future prospects of the company. In the context of corporate America, his executive compensation package can be considered low. This whole compensation issue raised is just a Red Herring.... Sincerely, ztect

To: REW who wrote (23728)	4/4/1999 11:07:00 AM
From: ztect	Respond to of 44908

REW............ I found this portion of the following paragraph in a response to you particularly ignorant. "...The same applies to charities, there are literally hundred of diverse charities, for each you'll have to not only customize the card and the promotional material, you'll have to customize the product. All these are Herculean efforts, they do not happen by themselves. And, you will be competing with a plurality of other marketers in the field....." Customize the card and product....Like duh..... Herculean efforts? NO....I told you the author of this post was clueless. The card is easy to customize....That's the whole point. Geeze, the guy could have read the press release about the relationship with the Tampa Bay Lighting and facility where the collectibilty of the cards is mentioned as a possibility. The products delivered via the number of different cards will obviously be diverse especially considering the number of registered domain names. This dude...SIMPLY JUST DOESN'T GET IT...... For whatever reason, he also doesn't seem interested in understanding the company either.... Hardly seems worth the time or energy trying to inform him, since he obviously chooses to be misinformed and bombastic. Sincerely, z

To: REW who wrote (23728)	4/4/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: Andrew H	Respond to of 44908

>>by non-shareholders with no desire to become shareholders and only a desire to cause direct damage to the value of another's investment.<< You have described these low lifes precisely in the above statement. Vultures, jackals and hyenas (here is the correct spelling for you, zeev), all of them. Even worse, they pretend they are doing us a favor.