Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave D'Biker who wrote (10847)	4/4/1999 2:01:00 PM
From: on parole	Respond to of 25548

Dave, How could you conclude that a holding company/shell would be detrimental to shareholders without knowing any of the details first? By the way MDIN has been adamant from day one that there would be no reverse split. I just received assurances again that along with the name change there will not be a reverse. So Dave, how do you propose shareholder value be maximized with limited funds and many properties which need to be proven up for us to obtain fair market value? This seems to be a prudent avenue to explore.

To: Dave D'Biker who wrote (10847)	4/4/1999 7:34:00 PM
From: Vince Moretto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Dave, WAMC did a 15 to 1 reverse split, and a subsequent name change to Cerro Dorado (CDCH) last week, A WAMC shareholder told me that MDIN management had been in discussion with WAMC regarding the takeover of the WAMC shell. Subsequent to the change to CDCH, no news has been released by the new entity. Can anyone on this thread either confirm or deny whether MDIN has taken over the WAMC shell, now called Cerro Dorado (CDCH) ? And for what purpose? Vince