Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Coz who wrote (10850)	4/4/1999 1:23:00 PM
From: Dave D'Biker	Respond to of 25548

In order to know for a fact that what we have is a potential short squeeze before us, perhaps someone here will cite case examples where and when this has successfully been achieved pertaining to an OTC-Penny issue such as ours. Is anyone else getting suspicious about this whole theory of "naked shorting" as it applies to MDIN.... who covers-who doesn't? What other reason(s) would there be for the possible name and or cupid# change? dd-Curious in California

To: Coz who wrote (10850)	4/4/1999 1:50:00 PM
From: Geoff Coates-Wynn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

We can't stress this enough, Cos. Just because someone says it here does not make it so. People pick up the idea and run with it, sparking all these little side conversations, and before you know it, readers of the thread think it must be a known fact. Then, if the price doesn't jump magically to $10 on Monday, they get all disappointed and sell. Maybe it's true, maybe it's not. People should invest on facts and their own reasonable assumptions of events which may transpire in the future. Rumors on a thread should be viewed with the utmost scrutiny. I can't recall how many rumors/wishes have been posted here and not been anywhere close to the truth. That said, I hope good things for us all... Geoff