Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (33676)	4/4/1999 10:49:00 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

"I wouldn't join a club that would have me for a member"? There might be an element of that involved, though that assumes that the aversion is a consequence of the adoration, which is not always the case. For reasons I do not entirely understand, I've always tended to get a lot of attention, sometimes approaching adoration, from weak-willed women, a type which I find most uninteresting. I would certainly have to question the mental competence of any woman capable of enough self-deception to permit her to adore me. The question assumed that the adoration would be pleasing. Probably one reason why I couldn't answer it. I keep cats in preference to dogs largely because adoration makes me uneasy. the question, to put it bluntly, was, would you rather f** a woman whom you adore, but only loves you, or a woman who adores you, but you only love.* Either would be nice, and certainly a pleasant change. Since we are before the hypothetical fact I would choose the former, despite knowing perfectly well that I would feel otherwise after the fact. Being male, you see, I am congenitally incapable of allowing "after the fact" to enter into these calculations.