Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yousef who wrote (54203)	4/5/1999 10:59:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1570917

Yousef, Depends on your timeframe, from the point of those posts. For instance this one " "AMD held 20 and closed at 20 15/16. 1 5/8 off the recent low of 19 5/16. So the recent low held...today. You'll probably get a shot to cover tomorrow." From there AMD ran to over 25. So if you had covered at say 2O, gone long, then reshorted at 25, you would have made more money. As far as a profit for the quarter. Things changed. I'd be surprised if they didn't lose money. At any rate. If you traded more you could have made money on those suggestions. I'm starting to wonder if you really have any position in AMD since you've forgot about time erosion. I also realize you are just trying to cover your ridiculously wrong assumption that AMD would never yield volume in the 300, 333, 350, 366, 380, 400, 450 and 475 MHz speed grades. Making a bad trade here and there is understandable but missing AMDs entire ramp up from the point of a "process expert" must be really embarrassing. Maybe if you behave yourself we will let you live it down graciously. <G> Jim