Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (77709)	4/5/1999 9:52:00 AM
From: billwot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

PF-I give up. You win!! billwot

To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (77709)	4/5/1999 3:36:00 PM
From: nihil	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

---OT---(I guess) Gates has about 22 % of MSFT common, as I remember. This does not constitute "control" in a legal sense. He does not have to consolidate his personal holding company with MSFT, he is personally free to buy competing firms, and many other advantages. He is a man of such delicate sensibility that he doesn't not have his board pay him a huge salary, nor does he, almost alone (along with Balmer I think) does not accept stock options. I think if MSFT did something very wrong and was sued, it would be impossible to "pierce the corporate veil" and recover from Bill himself for any unpaid corporate bills. The test here is the "test of control" -- does Gates make the critical decisions of the Board. Without examining the minutes of the board and determining if he is always the decision maker it would be difficult to prove that he actually has control. He is an aggressive, dominant man who nearly always gets his way, I suppose. Were I he, I would occasionally join a losing vote to establish that I was not in control while retaining, what he will always have, I suppose, "effective control." Most CEO's build alliances with major institutional and private stockholders to assure that they win all votes and proxy fights. They maintain effective control, even though they own only an insignificant proportion of common stock in their company.