Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (24091)	4/5/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: BigAppleBoy	Respond to of 44908

If everybody is long,then who the hell is selling? This BS,I am sorry

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (24091)	4/5/1999 11:38:00 AM
From: V$gas.Com	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Sounds like, what you called, Robert Gordon. (One who pads his own pockets with shareholder money) Not only investing in the company but trying to sell them your enterprises. Very clever. Yeah, I would like to know more how you are staying arms length and not using the investing public for funds to further your own advancement. It sounds to me that you have started the deal, recruited investors and now you are trying to sell the company your ideas. Pretty tidy Zeev. That was a nice write up. Was the resume posted by DD written by you also? I can't imagine what kind of ego you must have. Like I said earlier, DD invited you here, now why don't you take further discussions of TSIG with DD to PM. It seems that most on this thread really don't care what you have to say. V$gas.Com

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (24091)	4/5/1999 12:32:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

That's all very impressive. If you're so knowledgeable, then why did you state something so obviously incorrect as you did about the insider shares, as listed in the yahoo link you referenced, as being "sold"? And, again, the 2.2 million was an incorrect figure to begin with, as some of those are the same shares - just a renewed 144. I am not purposely trying to be contentious, it's just that your statements on that issue make no sense whatsoever. Especially coming from an "expert." As well as some others which don't really need to be re-hashed. It should be added that there was benefit from your presence here, IMHO, as you did force a much closer look at some issues, the options being one. As to this: In that connection, last year I have sent via personal selective e-mail, only to people that were engaged with me on the threads (thus qualified as "cyber-acquaintances", if you will), a note to determine their respective interest in getting on the ground floor of such an opportunity. Over a year ago - yes, over a year ago - I myself received one of your solicitous emails and I didn't know you at all. In fact, I still don't know how the heck you got my email address (which is not the same one I have now). It wasn't in my profile then (and still isn't).