Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Von And who wrote (13187)	4/5/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: Millionairess	Respond to of 27722

ANYONE - got the e/r date this month? thanx EOM

To: Von And who wrote (13187)	4/5/1999 9:37:00 PM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27722

Well I've only read a few of C's posts on this thread (as I skim because there are too many), however the brief dialogue I've seen doesn't acknolledge his contribution on informing true status of insider selling and effect of warrant holders on dilution etc. Rather than engage a dialogue on the facts, a couple of posters labeled him as being some part of a short selling group that were "responsible" for NAVR's poor behavior when the S-1 was filed. I try to be respectfull (and maybe he hasn't used the best of manners), however anyone with any sense knows that is foolishness and the behavior of those that label and attack him is typical behavior of a stock tout. I find it bothersome to see one view dominate a board particularly when the analysis is dependant on gut feel, opinion and lack of fundamentals, issues that effect how the stock trades or the longer term value of a stock. I should point out that I am long NAVR (not pocket change), and fully understand and appreciate C's perspective on NAVR, however that doesn't change my goal, in fact it helps me further understand the stock. Of course my intent isn't to invest in NAVR, rather trade in NAVR. I'm continuely supprised by how browsers of SI or newcommers can be influenced by confident touts who then find themselves holding a stock that's dropping like a stone in a lake, exiting with a fast loss or worse with a long term position that's worth .50 on the dollar. Bullying Christian and labeling him as part of some group (that doesn't exist) is only an selfish attempt to suppress opinion (not to mention plain funny) Best Regards, Mad2