SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George C. Grasser who wrote (11400)4/5/1999 9:34:00 PM
From: Howard C.  Respond to of 11684
 
Well, that didn't seem to bother Linda "I'm Your Best Friend" Tripp, and it IS illegal in Maryland where she did it. But then again, blubber can be intimating. IMHO.



To: George C. Grasser who wrote (11400)4/6/1999 7:55:00 AM
From: PatiBob  Respond to of 11684
 
It's legal in the State of Texas as long as one party knows it's being taped (yes, seems silly doesn't it?) I'm in Texas and have had occasion to put that law to test with a satisfactory outcome. It makes the taped party more willing to recant a false statement if they are confronted with their own words.

PB



To: George C. Grasser who wrote (11400)4/8/1999 2:54:00 AM
From: LT  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11684
 
I've heard so many different opinions on the legality of recording a call

One party consent is the general fed rules. Some states differ, so you need to check there. One party consent means--- if one of the two callers knows the call is being recorded and consents, the recording is legal. Some states differ, so check it out.

LT


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News