SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Z Best Place to Talk Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ron McKinnon who wrote (19769)4/6/1999 8:35:00 AM
From: Larry S.  Respond to of 53068
 
Internet crazies and internet sanes: -
hey dino, don't despair. i too look at the internet crazies, and while there are astronomical gains available, there are also astronomical risks. not my cup of tea.
i prefer the "real" internuts: yhoo, aol, athm, nscp, and the strong potentials like inkt, cgmi, etc. these are the companies that have settled the outposts at the forks in the river - they have location and eyeballs, business plan and momentum.
in terms of classical training, i pretty much have thrown that out the window, at least in terms of p/e, debt to equity, earnings growth. but buying good companies in good business: wmt, ge, aol, csco, etc will never go out of style - and i have made a very nice return by buying good stocks and holding them.
i looked at trac yesterday, saw it moving, saw no reason for it other than internet momo, and passed, not my cup of tea.
but as you have said many times, if it works for you, then its a good system. you had almost 100% return in your trading account for the first quarter, along with a lot of energy and work - that is impressive.
my suggestion would be centered in the hold portion of your portfolio - don't be so quick to grab the 1-3 points, let good stocks run. oh, and by the way, did you hear about XXYY.com, they have a plan to develope internet affinity groups based on number of hits to a site, - no revenue, no earnings, but have $55 in cash (total) stock came out at $15 and ran to 45.... larry



To: Ron McKinnon who wrote (19769)4/6/1999 8:59:00 AM
From: JSB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53068
 
Ron, I feel exactly the same
way, and would assume that
there are legions of others.

The market has trained us to
look at income, growth, and
valuations, then summarily
threw those measures out
the window.

The question is whether the
market ever comes back to what
we know, or whether we are
forced to adapt.

I don't have a clue what the
final outcome will be, but it
does concern me greatly.

Yesterday as I watched the market
frenzy, 3 of my long positions,
each with a PE under 10 and growth
in excess of 25% got hit. Each
traded up initially, each closed
at the low of the day, each giving
the impression that money was coming
out of them in favor of some stock
with no earnings. IT SUCKS

Regards,
Jeff

PS: I have tried and will continue
to try to change, it does drive me
nuts.



To: Ron McKinnon who wrote (19769)4/8/1999 9:54:00 AM
From: DanZ  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 53068
 
CURE.

News out after the close yesterday...the stock opened firmer and then took a big dump on relatively low volume. The high is 11 5/8, the low is 8 7/8. This looks like a total overreaction on fears about the unknown. The company could be completely clean and this looks like a good gamble at 9 1/2.

pcquote.com

Dan