Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (31252)	4/6/1999 10:21:00 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116786

Hey,Yenta! U haven't missed 1 o'my cyberpost N 5+yrs. LiarLiarSpandexOnFire!!! Speaking of bill not having anything to hide, why have his donations only gone up $4,000 in a little over 2 weeks? He and his fearsome 4some running out of money or have you forgotten the juicy little tidbit that 4 of them have furnished in excess of 50% of the donations, aka and the other HonorBoredBuddies have kicked in...letmme see, what is 20K divided by 220-ish? $90.90 per it looks like... So, how long is it gonna take before the bald-headed little prancin'pro ex-football receiver now turned "donations-receiver" gonna take to reach the retainer fee amounts he's still not willing to disclose to his potential donors? 12-15-30years? He's worse than the immigrants we've drugged by our opiate of promised-land-wealth-if-you-just-can-someone-manage-to-get-here! Thanks for reminding me we've gata-land full of leaches already overhere!!! GET A REAL JOB, MURPHY!...or can't you hold onto one of those anymore than you could the ole pigskin???? BTW, I've been meaning to ask one of you football nuts: Murphy wouldn't be the famous Wrong Way Receiver I remember hearing about a few years back is he? You know, the guy that the NEPatriots had to let go because he was always nailed behind the line of scrimmage??? O/49r Speaking of nailing...here's those nasty questions Bill won't answer for anyone...let alone potential donors now that the suckers have been picked clean... Hell, with those low site "sightings," the press corp isn't even checking in on a regular basis:

To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (31252)	4/6/1999 10:42:00 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116786

Here's those nasty 6 Qs(now 9) Murphy WON'T answer, no matter how politely he's asked!!! *YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeehaw!* Nope, Bill's just asking fer money, won't answer Qs for anyone, ...let alone potential donors (now that the early suckers have been picked clean...) Hell, with those low site "sightings," the press corp isn't even checking in on his GATA-eat-somehow-b/c-he-doesn't-have-a-real-job website on a regular basis! *HELL!! Matt Drudge's numbers are higher than that just from the White House checking in!!!* original post = #4503 on Dutch Central Bank Selling SI thread 3/18/99 at 1:47 PM PST The Questions are: (again for the 8th [MIRROR] time:) 1) Since GATA is a For Profit Corporation, there are you and 2 others as officers. Is this correct? Answered 3/18/99: GATA is a "Not-For-Profit" organization. Answered 3/19/99: In reply to Darleen (see above) this appears to not be the correct answer, so this is still unanswered by a yes or a no. Writes: Pete S 3/20/99: "GATA is a 'not for profit' but I don't know any details." 2) What is the retainer fee being requested by the law firm you, as GATA are pretty set upon using? 3) Since you are exploring an anti-trust action --and have noted many times on this thread how much cash settlement M&B won on their most visible previous action-- is or is not this case being taken on a contingency fee/split agreement? 4) If yes it is a contingency fee case, then why is there a retainer fee requested in advance? 5) Assuming success in your actions, what is the current GATA plan for splitting of their portion of the judgement award? 6) Since this is a private, for profit corporation, how do contributors secure timely, audited financial statements? Partial Answer/extrapolation: this is now declared to be a "Not for Profit" as of 3/18/99. ººº As such, there are legit avenues, governed by the state of Delaware, and the particular IRS organizational code, for GATA contributors or any interested party who wishes a look into the books on a timely manner a means to do so. ººº Readers: Please refer to retraction/modification under point one. Delaware filing structure is back in the non-disclosed category, and remains to be answered. NEW ADDITIONS #7 What is the A) estimate of costs of fundraising by your target PR firm, B) initial deposit amount currently requested as the result of your inquires of the PR firm. Bill sez: thus far the biggest contributors to GATA are the Committee members themselves. #8 So if your much ballyhoed lawfirm choice and your dittoed PR firm choice take the committee members biggest proportion of contibuted funds (what 85-90% of $38,000 is from you 3?) will any of the 3 of you be able to eat? You can spend your personal funds anyway you want, Bill, no problem there. But just how is the PR firm going to put money into your organization and get the tax write off they want for their "donation?" Big bucks don't come cheap, or without strings! But you should already know that since you won't answer the "stringy questions" from the Silent Six behind my posts! And what is the percentage they will keep of the funds they raise? There are not for profit organizations in the real world who barely spend 3c on every raised dollar to the actual "educational and political cause" as Chris Powell describes it. How much of each dollar is YOUR P/R firm going to feed back to you XYZ committee members? #9 (From Dr. Searle) Will you be returning the donations money to those who contributed when GATA fails to file the lawsuit? *It's been 7 business days, Murphy, since you visited the attorneys officially in your much ballyhooed junket on donor money to Philadelphia...how come you ain't talking DOLLAR SIGN goals yet?* Even United Way tells what their City/State/National donation total goal is per year!!! Why should you be any less accountable/transparent? Must be b/c the Gold World is alREADY united!!! *AGAINST YOU!!!*

To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (31252)	4/6/1999 11:17:00 AM
From: lorne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116786

Hello Bobby. I'm not trying to defend o49r she is very capable of doing that herself. I just feel that it is wrong, wrong, wrong to label someone racist without just cause and proof. If someone labeled you , Hutch or anyone else racist without what I thought to be just causes I would likely speak up. Bobby I'm not trying to argue with you but I ask you to look again what you said. >>>" but just as somebody who has to put somebody else down to make themselves feel better about themselves.. that to me is where racism comes from.. everytime I hear somebody trying to put somebody down as a group.. I look at the person as a worm..who must feel so very inferior he/she needs to victimize somebody for their own pathetic state.". Would this statement apply to all those anti gold posters on this and other threads who seem to derive great pleasure from putting down a group of people known as " Gold bugs ". I just think that if someone knows they have wrongly labeled another person a racist even if they hate this person they should promptly apologize and get on with the normal name calling. Take care Lorne