SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bazmataz who wrote (55788)4/6/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: Steven N  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Is Compaq crazy? REREAD THIS

By David Simons
Red Herring Online
February 22, 1999

Since January, Compaq (CPQ) has committed more than
$500 million to Internet acquisitions: $200 million for
Shopping.com (OTC: IBUY), a second-tier online retailer
whose stock has a checkered regulatory history, and a
reported $300 million for privately held Zip2, which
provides local portal and e-commerce systems for
newspapers.

And the spending spree may not be
over. Compaq's basic plan is to ally
new acquisitions with AltaVista, the
search service it acquired in the
1997 buyout of Digital Equipment
Corp. Compaq has been spending
mightily to morph AltaVista into a
full-fledged portal to compete with
Yahoo (YHOO).

Why?

Relentless decline in PC prices, particularly in the
consumer market, threatens revenue and profit growth for
all computer manufacturers. Compaq sees the Internet
and continuing revenue streams from it as an antidote.

NOT A PLAN
Compaq began in June of last year by offering
Compaq.net, a branded access service provided by GTE
(GTE). Since then it has been pursuing the PC's potential
as the "ultimate portal." You can see this strategy in
Compaq's relationship with AltaVista, which had been a
footnote in the DEC deal until Compaq configured its
consumer PCs to put Compaq Internet services right in
the faces of new owners -- via set-up selection screens
and a keyboard cluster of Internet buttons.

Compaq's stated objective is for its amalgam of Internet
acquisitions to become "one of the top three revenue sites
on the Net by year-end 2002."

So far, Compaq's plan reflects more the handiwork of
investment bankers, corporate committees, and
consultants than the essential soul of Internet
entrepreneurship.

Indeed, rationale for the purchase of Zip2 is right out of
the consultants' playbook. The idea is that because most
consumer purchases are made locally, local e-commerce
is a must-have. But America Online (AOL), Microsoft
(MSFT), and a gaggle of others have been pursuing that
notion for three years at enormous cost -- and only
modest success. Plumbers, beauty salons, and even
groceries are likely to remain off the beaten path of
consumer e-commerce.

COMPAQ PAID DEARLY
Compaq's $200 million Shopping.com acquisition is in
cash. Reportedly, the $300 million Zip2 buy is, as well.

But most major acquisitions of Internet companies --
especially public ones -- have been by other Internet
companies and paid for with their red-hot stocks.
Because of the risk inherent in stock, acquisitions paid
with it usually are at a premium to what would be the
cash price. For example, had Amazon.com (AMZN)
bought Shopping.com for stock, the equivalent dollar value
in shares would have been at least $400 million, double
the $200 million cash paid by Compaq. That would be 50
times Shopping.com's run rate sales. By contrast,
Amazon stock at its all-time high in January traded at 30
times forward sales. In effect, Compaq's valuation of an
Amazon also-ran was 66 percent richer than the real
thing -- and twice more than Amazon's current price/sales
ratio of 15.

But Compaq couldn't pay in stock. At a modest 25
percent premium to cash, Compaq earnings would have
been diluted 9 percent by the Shopping.com acquisition
alone. That's no problem for Internet companies, which
are valued far more on revenue than profit. But it would
have seriously soured Compaq shareholders.

Compaq's justification of the $500 million outlay was
backhanded. The company said it plans to spin off its
collection of Internet properties within a year. That would
suggest an IPO of an initial 20 percent of a billion-dollar
market capitalization. $200 million would be the largest
Internet IPO to date. Of course, that presumes Compaq's
Net properties perform respectably in the meantime, and
that the market for Internet IPOs remains vibrant. The
latter is an especially risky presumption.

If Yahoo or Amazon acquires a company for stock and
the acquisition doesn't bring the anticipated benefits, direct
loss is mainly the post-acquisition resources expended in
trying. If stock market conditions nix an IPO, and
Shopping.com or Zip2 stumble, Compaq is out $500
million of hard cash.

ANOTHER BIG QUESTION
Is a PC manufacturer genetically suited to compete in
providing Internet services? The businesses are vastly
different -- a gulf wider than the notion of Microsoft
manufacturing PCs or Intel (INTC) doing software. IBM
(IBM) has spanned it, but only in corporate computing.
Yet Compaq put its senior VP of consumer PC products,
Rod Schrock, in charge of the company's portal pursuits.

Compaq's focus on Internet services becomes more
perplexing in light of passed-over alternatives more in line
with Compaq's strengths. Despite the expectation of mass
markets for Internet appliances as alternatives to PCs,
Compaq hasn't been at all aggressive about moving into
mainstream consumer electronics.

$500 million cash would buy a major foothold in the
beleaguered electronics behemoths of Southeast Asia.
Yet apart from producing a handheld PC, Compaq's
moves in the non-desktop space have been muted.

There are no formulas for Internet success, only for
failure. Success on the Internet derives from abiding
passion and astute agility. Compaq appears to being
relying on formulas.

David Simons is managing director of Digital Video
Investments.

Compaq announced in January that it would spin out AltaVista.





To: Bazmataz who wrote (55788)4/6/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: rupert1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Baz: "care to put in print what trades you are making? If you are expecting a breakout to the upside, why aren't you buying like a madman? Margin? Calls?

Are you serious?