SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (54827)4/6/1999 3:48:00 PM
From: sjemmeri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
>So far, the intellectual reasoning behind the rise in stock pe ratios has been two-fold: 1. Growing eps. Last year eps were down and the market hit record levels, so that has proven to be a scam. <

I'm not defending the rise in PE but hasn't most of the recent
PE expansion been in those stocks that have continued to grow
earnings?



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (54827)4/6/1999 3:49:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin  Respond to of 132070
 
I agree, but would remind you of the only reasonable argument I've heard for higher PE's: that investors, for whatever reason, are accepting lower expected returns in return for the risk of holding equities. If so, it's possible PE's could remain elevated. However, I conclude that there is no evidence for this view, and lots of evidence that the aggregate of investors now think stocks will always rise 25% or more per year. In the latter case, there's no place for PE's to go in the long run but down... so, what's keeping them? <grumble> -mb



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (54827)4/6/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike,

>Does the Fed want to continue to accomodate the market mania? Of course.<<

I fail to see why the Fed would want to do this assuming they have anyone's interest at heart besides their own reputations and a few Washington politicians. Oops. I answered my own question. <g>

WC



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (54827)4/6/1999 4:04:00 PM
From: valueminded  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike:

As long as the government can fool everyone into thinking that long term bonds are a great buy now cause interest rates are heading lower, they can keep this up as long as they want. (look at the long end of the treasuries today)

So, companies borrow to buy back shares, FED cuts short term interest rates to allow easy money, shareholders pull money out of the market and go into debt to support the buying spree. Treasury collects record tax revenues fueled by stock market capital gains. Everybody wins <g>

Now eventually, you would think we would hit a debt ceiling but as long as we can convince everyone to buy our debt whilst expanding the money supply we should be able to continue.

On a side note, it is a good thing we can ignore (and convince bondholders to ignore) the volatile component of the CPI this month as gasoline prices have rocketed 20% within the past 6 weeks.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (54827)4/6/1999 7:14:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 132070
 
To All, Serbia has asked for a cease fire and has invited all the Kosovo refugees they didn't get a chance to kill to come back and let them have another shot. I don't think we will buy into that one. <g>