Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nuke44 who wrote (2210)	4/6/1999 8:10:00 PM
From: Jacalyn Deaner	Respond to of 17770

WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE???? - Moslem Arab world NOT doing anything to help their own; small help from Jordan. I brought this up yesterday; however, everyone continues to bash and want the US to do it all. Now, we the infidels have chosen to fight for an Arab cause and the Arabs accept it, but do not contribute - will however, terrorize the infidels at later convenient date. Prove me wrong. Jacalyn

To: nuke44 who wrote (2210)	4/6/1999 8:14:00 PM
From: dumbmoney	Respond to of 17770

In as far as the ongoing war waged in the former Yugoslavia does pose a serious threat to the security of several nations in NATO, it's actions fall well within the NATO charter to provide for the defense of all NATO members. Waiting until the war spilled over onto NATO soil may well have been too late and definitely would have served the purposes of those who would see NATO weakened. You believe this crap???? Man you are gullible. And this is not "defensive" by any stretch of the imagination. The Russians are correct when they label it aggression. You can argue that it is a justified aggression, but it IS aggression nevertheless.

To: nuke44 who wrote (2210)	4/6/1999 8:15:00 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

What law did NATO break? How about bombing innocent civilians and attacking a sovereign nation that is not part of NATO? This is the first time in its history that NATO has been an agressor in clear violation of its own treaties. As for your assertion that the Balkan thing will spill over into NATO: You're kidding, right? Who said that would happen, other than Bill Clinton? Now that he's attacked Serbia, he has brought about the very thing you assert would have happened. Now i know where you get your name from. I'm surprised you're not advocating a first strike on the Ukraine. They have missiles. Shouldn't we get 'em before they get us?

To: nuke44 who wrote (2210)	4/6/1999 8:29:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 17770

In as far as the ongoing war waged in the former Yugoslavia does pose a serious threat to the security of several nations in NATO, it's actions fall well within the NATO charter to provide for the defense of all NATO members. Huh? What security of what nations? Please name the nations, and name the security threat. The fact is that even Clinton isn't claiming we bombed Serbia to protect any NATO countries. And if you look at the conditions NATO/Clinton are imposing as a prerequisite to stopping the bombings, there are NONE that have any relationship to the defense of any NATO country. Facts, not smoke, please.