Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : 1st Net Technologies ( FNTT ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John H. Farro who wrote (1319)	4/6/1999 10:12:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1827

Robin, it's all in how you present the "facts". If you get an anonymous call that "the CEO is a convicted felon, trust me", and you spread those exact words on SI, if that's not true, I'd think that would be textbook libel. Say someone on Yahoo posts that information and you quote that person (assuming that person is not also you under another name), that wouldn't be libel, IMO, unless you continue to cite that post without making any further attempts to verify it. If, instead, your source was a "reputable" news article, my guess is you could probably get away with citing that at will. If the source is an SEC document, I would think citing that continually would actually be considered a public service ;^). The safest thing to avoid libel is to not say things directly. If a CEO cancels three contracts in a row, to use your example, and the stock price tanks, instead of saying "the CEO is a crook and should have his ass sued", try saying something like "CEO's have been sued bigtime for less than that." BTW, you're "I canceled those PRs because to save my daughter's life at the hands of kidnappers" analogy is just a variation on the "the reason I stole was to feed my starving children". That sort of thing doesn't usually hold up in court unless you can really prove extenuating circumstances. - Jeff P.S. I'm not a lawyer so please treat everything I say as "in my opinion".

To: John H. Farro who wrote (1319)	4/6/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1827

Suppose you have information from two different sources that you believe to be reliable that John Doe is a crook. You publish the fact that John Doe is a crook. Now, suppose it turns out that your two sources lied to you. Should you be guilty of libel? This is why I'm always careful to qualify what I say with phrases like "in my opinion", "it's my understanding", "sources I consider reliable say"... and so on. I also never call anyone a "crook", even if I'm morally certain they are one, and don't characterize any company as a "scam" until that fact is very publicly proved. For all this, I'm sometimes accused of being "evasive", and "playing cat and mouse games", but that's better than being "sued".