SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (54921)4/7/1999 8:16:00 AM
From: gbh  Respond to of 132070
 
Carl, great post, with lots of very informative stuff. I totally agree with your conclusion that,

For mobile phones, my guess is that the dominating intellectual barriers to entry are possessed by the handset makers, and resides partly in their software, partly in their RF design abilities and partly in their sales/marketting/brandname advantage.

In particular, the software is key. And one article mentioned that the handset code "will always" be assembler code. This tends to lock the supplier into a single DSP source. So jumping from supplier to supplier just isn't that easy, especially with time to market so critical, with ever expanding feature sets.

But I totally disagree with this conclusion,

For this reason, I would expect them to eventually cut the DSP makers out of the deal.

These guys just don't bring the processor design expertise, process knowledge, and volume to the table to justify the huge investment. And since there is sufficient competition to keep DSP prices in line, there just isn't any reason to assume the handset guys will go this route.

Gary



To: Bilow who wrote (54921)4/7/1999 10:49:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
Carl, Good note. Let's name all the chip markets where Intel's entry did not spell the end of profits for other players. <g>