Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Saflink Corp. (ESAF) Biometric Software Provider -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fredman who wrote (4375)	4/7/1999 11:17:00 AM
From: bob jordan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4676

Fred, As always, NRI remains a "tomorrow" company. The deals, the sales, the return on freekin' investment will all happen tomorrow. Sometimes tomorrow never comes, though. I don't get it, they have to be doing something all day...I just have no idea what. Of course, I thought that way the last couple of years I owned NRI, hindsight being 20/20, and that theory did not hold up. No results, you see. I mean with sales, they have a bunch of software (albiet with no algorithm of their own), and alliances out the wazoo. But that doesn't necessarily translate into profits or revenue. Whatever. After years of sales that rival the revenue generated by my neighbor's son's lawnmowing business, it would be nice to see a rather large deal with some heavyweights. Not only would the profit help, but the name association would help take this company out of the "freekin' who?" category and into the "they must know something for the big boys to be playing with them" category. And if Wall Street is fooled into thinking the latter category is true long enough, we can all sell out as happy investors. The thing that bothers me about this deal (GTW,NRI, etc...) is that the guy on Yahoo (Realestatelion?) keeps screaming that it would happen. If this guy's source was accurate, would he not tell this guy to be quiet? Wouldn't this prompt an investigation into the company; there has got to be some insider trading laws violated there???! It just seems like a bad idea to scream about future events that we are not supposed to know about (no public disclosure about talks by company). I could be wrong. But, if it avoids another blood-letting Reg S sale, I am all for it. Regards, Bob