Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : BCE Emergis - global e-commerce -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ruby who wrote (494)	4/7/1999 11:32:00 AM
From: Syl98	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1341

This could explain it for now: Message 8752826

To: Ruby who wrote (494)	4/7/1999 11:54:00 AM
From: salva	Respond to of 1341

You are riight Ruby. Sometimes feel that IFM 'controlled' . Look what happened yesterday. Pre open bids were pistol hot $40 -42 then at opening 39 and closed 38!! Why????? Did someone mention that some 'news' was coming out-then false alarm? Just wondering. Very strange for that kind of action. Sure IFM has a ver small float left in small guys hands(after Instituitional holdings and BCE 68% share) So therefore SPLIT makes a lot of sense. So does a guick Nasdaq listing!! Hey rocki where are you??? rgds salva