SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chuck who wrote (31489)4/7/1999 12:23:00 PM
From: Jenna  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 120523
 
Credibility.. we look for 5% gains on anticipation. We build our earnings plays on that tenet. FVCX was up 36% on anticipations and for me it was total gain of 24%. Both AKLM and FVCX gave me that. Holding a stock for a 'life sentence' is not the order of this thread, or any stock trading site on the internet. The only people hurt on FVCX were the 'long time holders' and not the traders.

Now please either give us your pick of the day or go back to your lurking status. You have proven absolutely nothing, except that you have not read any of our strategies at the market gems web site. SO please go back and check it out and while you are there you can look at www.pristine.com and check their strategy as well (5% is the goal of a trade anything beyond that you are trading at your own risk). and before anyone can hope to discuss 'credibility' I'd have to see their own credentials and track record. Where is yours?



To: Chuck who wrote (31489)4/7/1999 12:24:00 PM
From: Adelle  Respond to of 120523
 
Dear Chuck,
Before you offer "constructive criticism", try "walking a mile in our moccasins" with us.........you will learn how to handle these watch lists stocks and the earnings plays with Jenna and the hampster crowd....
Offered in all friendliness and best wishes,
Adelle



To: Chuck who wrote (31489)4/7/1999 12:30:00 PM
From: gladman  Respond to of 120523
 
Chuck, you're posting this on the 31,489th post???

Take a look at the back posts and then comment on the credibility of this thread.