Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (10020)	4/7/1999 3:30:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Zeev, <<something is fishy>> Agreed. I still don't know their definition of "head ore", do you? How much screening, how much is concentrate? Maybe they are reporting their inquart? <VBG> What difference does it make, Bob and Ed will calculated the value. <VVBG>

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (10020)	4/7/1999 3:55:00 PM
From: Ed Fishbaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Zeev What if the goodies concentration in the slime is 20% or 30%? then you get down to around 1 kg per ton. No? Ed

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (10020)	4/7/1999 9:28:00 PM
From: Bob Walsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Zeev, referencing your statement "Another small discrepancy was the note that Sabin needs a kilo or two of the slime to determine the best refining procedure. What has Sabin received so far? Few grams of the slime? No, something is fishy." GPGI has tried various process alternatives on different ores and has further modified some process after the samples were sent to Sabin, therefor Sabin wants a sample from the process that they will use in production. Where is there a discrepancy and what is fishy????? Regards, Bob