SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Charters who wrote (17850)4/7/1999 6:49:00 PM
From: Walt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26850
 
So after exploring they, as you suggested, start concentrating on the dyke because these dyke fissures as proven in south Africa can be quite good and economic. They are now outlining the size of the deposit and trying to fiqure out the grade.
The problem I have is in one post you say dykes can be good then there are a bunch of posts saying they aren't. You say you would run the sample on site yourself and suggest WSP should do it because it is economic then what about the security question. WSP is doing it at impartial plants with 3rd party monitors. Your arguement that they are spending too much and then claiming you could do it for less completely ignores your other arguement about security and accuracy of results.
I read your posts Erik, they have alot of good info, then wham they seem to contradict things you've said earlier.
I know its your style but it can be very confusing.
You have a problem with WSP, fine. I've had raging arguements with people about where to drill holes or how exploration should be done but its their program.
AJ says one needs two thousand dollar rock to mine fissures in the NWT but wont say how much two thousand dollar rock one needs.
Each deposit has its own economics thats why companies do feasability studies. I dont know weither they have a mine or not, Ill wait for the numbers but they sure have a dyke I wish I had staked up.
regards Walt:)