SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (54602)4/7/1999 7:26:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577867
 
Off topic!

<Given the unprecedented level of hostility by Clinton's opponents- had he admitted any wrongdoing he would have been torn limb from limb. Presidential Politics should not be confused with The Brady Bunch. Did Reagan or Bush ever admit any wrongdoing? And why not?>

Scumbria, there's a lot of things wrong with politics today. That doesn't mean I have to accept the dishonest politicians just because there are very few honest ones out there these days.

And yes, Scumbria, I do believe in upholding morals even in the brutal environment of presidential politics. I realize that a lot of people think that morals are irrelevant as long as the economy is strong, but I'm sure you'll excuse me for taking the so-called "Brady Bunch" view of life.

Tenchusatsu



To: Scumbria who wrote (54602)4/7/1999 10:24:00 PM
From: TGPTNDR  Respond to of 1577867
 
Scumbria Off Topic Re: < Did Reagan or Bush ever admit any wrongdoing? And why not?> If my memory remains, Bush admitted to marital infidelity, and Regan apologised on national TV that 'arms for hostages' was in fact a bribe, and illegal. Everybody makes mistakes, only total schmucks lie to the end about them. Clinton is the worst since Nixon, by a ton, IMO.

tgptndr