SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (2602)4/7/1999 11:42:00 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17770
 
"Emile, if what you said were true, there would be neither Arab Israelis, nor Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank."

Not really! The radical Zionist elements and the fundamentalist rabbinical leaders have succeeded in driving out 2,500,000 Palestinians from Israel proper. This Ethnic cleansing has resulted in the Palestinian refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon and Syria.
The reason there are still Palestinian Christians and Moslems living in Israel is because of the outcry of the international community. Here is article from the Daily Haaretz by a brave Jewish-Israeli human rights leader. Human rights organization have helped in curtainling some of the Zionist racial policies.

Memorandum on institutionalized racial discrimination
by and in the State of Israel

By Elias Davidsson - April 1991 (Revision July 1993)
The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations
in 1965, has now been ratified by most member states. Article 1 of
this Convention defines the term racial discrimination as 'any
distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race,
colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or
effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or
exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental
freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other
field of public life.'

This Convention lays down specific obligations on member states to
outlaw racial discrimination and penalize activities of racial
incitement. It must be borne in mind that the term 'racial
discrimination' is not basically a technical term but a term used to
encompass all kinds of discrimination based on a person's being or
origin (for which a person is not responsible). The Nazi persecution
of Jews has been pursued on the basis of 'racialism' and condemned by
the whole world as 'racial persecution', in spite of the fact that
Jews don't constitute a specific race.

When evaluating whether certain conditions or practices constitute
'racial discrimination', it is not imperative that intent is proved.
It suffices that conditions or practices have the 'effect of
nullifying or impairing' equality of rights (see above), regardless of
the declared intent of those conditions or practices.

The State of Israel defines itself as a Jewish and Zionist state. All
major Israeli parties identify themselves as Zionist. Racial
discrimination against non-Jews is grounded in Israeli laws,
regulations, practices and permeates all fields of public life. The
very definition of Israel as a Jewish State cannot but alienate the
indigenous non-Jewish population of the country, which constitutes -
depending on definition - between 18% and 60% of the population.

Most non-Jews who are living in or originate from areas under Israeli
control, identify themselves as Palestinians. Although most of these
are Muslim, there are also many Christian Palestinians and a few
hundred Jews, both religious and secular, who prefer to identify
themselves as Palestinians.

Zionism took off in Europe at the end of last century. It's aim was to
create in Palestine a state with Jewish majority in spite of the
adamant opposition of Palestinian Arabs (95% of the population). But
the Zionists were more powerful, militarily, economically and
technologically, and succeeded in 1948 in conquering 70% of the area
of Mandatory Palestine. After driving into exile most indigenous Arabs
from the conquered areas, approximately 750,000 people, and razing
most of their villages to the ground - over 370 villages - the
Zionists could finally establish a predominantly Jewish State. Only
150,000 non-Jews remained on territory controlled by the Zionists.

Once the Jewish State was established, it began enacting laws to help
the confiscation of land from native non-Jews, their political
repression and their destitution. This process was described in detail
by Azriel Karlibach, first editor and founding member of the Hebrew
newspaper Ma'ariv in a shattering article published in that paper on
25 Feb.. 1953 and by many other authors. The Israeli parliament passed
laws to make it impossible for non-Jews who temporarily left the area
of conflict to return to their homes or obtain access to their
possessions that were left behind. A law was enacted that enabled any
Jew in the world to immigrate to Israel and automatically become an
Israeli citizen. A law was enacted that enabled the World Zionist
Organisation and the Jewish Agency to act as a semi-official body, for
the exclusive benefit of Jews.

In 1967 the State of Israel invaded Egypt and Syria, under the
fallacious pretext of being threatened, and occupied the rest of
Palestine (the West Bank and the Gaza strip). Thus another 1.5 million
Palestinians fell under its jurisdiction. Its occupation of
Palestinian and other Arab territories is considered illegal by the
international community, as reflected in Security Council resolutions.
Israel has rejected all U.N. resolutions that deal with its treatment
of Palestinians and began without delay to entrench its occupation and
rule over these territories with the aim of annexing them at the
appropriate time. There has been no significant difference between the
Israeli governments concerning this aim, as construction for Jews in
the occupied territories continues unabated until this day. Part of
these territories, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, have already
been annexed by Israel, in defiance of international law, UN
resolutions and the wishes of the population concerned.

The Palestinian people are now divided into three main segments: Those
who remained in Israel in 1948 and their descendants (about 800,000
people), who live in Israel proper and have nominal Israeli
citizenship; those who live in the Palestinian territories occupied by
Israel in 1967 - Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza strip (about
1.8 million people); and those who live in exile, in Jordan, Lebanon,
Syria, the Gulf States and elsewhere (an estimated 2.5 million
people).

It must be emphasized that, although these people live under different
regimes, they are united in their self-perception as Palestinians,
that is as people identifying with Palestine.

All three segments of the Palestinian people suffer discrimination at
the hands of the Zionist State, but in different degrees.

Perhaps those who suffer the heaviest discrimination are those
Palestinians who were ejected from their homeland in 1948 and again in
1967, dispossessed of their homes and land, and rendered stateless.
The one and only criterion used by Israel to prevent these people from
returning to their homeland and receive equal treatment under Israeli
law, is that they are not Jews. Many of them still live in a destitute
condition in refugee camps in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and in the
territories occupied by Israel in 1967, supported by UN relief
agencies.

The non-Jewish population living in the Palestinian and other Arab
territories occupied by Israel in 1967 suffers not only blatant
discrimination but is subject to brutal military occupation. Israel
allows settlement of its own Jewish nationals in these areas and thus
violates the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. Jews settling in the
occupied areas enjoy full civil and political rights as Israeli
citizens. Their non- Jewish neighbors who are the overwhelming
majority of the population of these areas, are denied many civil and
all political rights. Their rights of movement, travel, assembly,
expression, the right to obtain a car licence, to start a business and
to buy industrial equipment, the right to educate children, all of
these basic rights are subject to arbitrary rulings by military
authorities and cannot be challenged in court. Only Jewish inhabitants
of the occupied territories are permitted to carry firearms, which
they use to terrorize defenceless non- Jews.

Some 800,000 people in Israel proper are not Jews: Most of them are
Muslim but there are also thriving Christian Arab communities in
Israel. For many years after the establishment of Israel they were
subjected to harsh military control. Much of their land was
confiscated by the State and handed to Jewish organisations for
exclusive Jewish settlement. They have been subject to massacres,
destitution and humiliation. While they enjoy, with Jewish Israelis,
the right to vote, they are discriminated against both through law and
in practice.

Approximately 92% of the surface of the State of Israel within the
Green Line is for all purposes closed to Palestinians who are
second-class citizens in Israel. They may neither legally live on such
land, nor rent or cultivate it. A direct effect of these policies is
that native non-Jewish citizens of Israel are in practice denied
residence and membership rights in the collective settlements,
kibbutzim. Non-Jews are discriminated against in many other ways: The
Government starves local authorities of Palestinian villages and
townships of funds; in some communities Palestinians are unwelcome or
forced to live in ghettos; Jewish families receive higher child
allocations than their non-Jewish neighbors, Palestinian schools
suffer underfunding and understaffing (as compared to Jewish schools);
Palestinian children are forced to learn their own history and
literature as interpreted by Zionists; Israelis who struggle for equal
rights and for the end of racial discrimination, are regularly and in
many ways harassed by the authorities.

The State of Israel refuses to acknowledge itself as the State of all
its inhabitants. Although Israeli governments have never openly
endorsed the 'transfer' idea (the forced removal from the country of
its native Palestinian population, that is, its ultimate Judaization),
Israeli government policies, such as inducing emigration of non-Jews
and forced underdevelopment of the Palestinian sector, have since the
establishment of Israel borne the mark of this ultimate aim. No
serious attempt is made by the Zionist authorities to integrate
Palestinian Arabs into Israeli public life. Thus, although comprising
approximately 17% of the population of Israeli citizens, no
Palestinian citizen of Israel has ever served as Cabinet member, as
director of a Ministry or of a national institution, as judge of the
Supreme Court, as ambassador of Israel, or in any position of power in
Israeli economic or financial life. Even Arab Members of Parliament
(Knesset) are systematically excluded from serving in 'sensitive'
Parliamentarian committees, solely because of their ethny. In this
'enlightened democracy of the Middle East', as Israel is often called,
a Jew cannot legally marry a non-Jew. Since its establishment in 1948,
Israeli governments have consistently rejected demands by the secular
public for the institution of civil marriage. Although intimate
relations between Jews and Arabs are legal, they are frowned upon by
Zionist society as 'befriending the enemy', something near treason.

Zionism rejects the idea of a modern secular state, based on equality
of all citizens. Zionism predicates a state where Jews have privileged
rights. Thus, according to Israeli law, a person born in London, who
has never visited Israel, does not speak Hebrew and professes atheism,
is granted automatic Israeli citizenship, if he can produce proof from
a rabbi that his mother was considered a Jew, while indigenous
Palestinian inhabitants who were born to Christian or Muslim parents
are at best tolerated but never considered as full fledged partners in
Israeli society. Racial discrimination, as defined in international
law, is thus not only reflected in Israeli laws and policies, but is
grounded in the very nature of Israel as a Jewish state, in public
perception and in the Zionist credo.

Any proposal for Israeli-Arab and Israeli-Palestinian peace that does
not address the issue of racial discrimination by Israel - that is the
Zionist nature of the State of Israel - is thus doomed to fail.

Selected bibliography



1. Uri Davis: Israel, an Apartheid State, Zed Books Ltd., London 1987

2. Sabri Jiryis: The Arabs in Israel, Monthly Review Press, New York,
1976

3. Ed. A.W. Kayyali: Zionism, Imperialism and Racism, Croom Helm,
London, 1979 (Writings by Arab, English and American scholars)

4. Abdeen Jabara: The Responsibility of the State of Israel According
to its International Commitments; Arab Studies Quarterly,
Spring/Summer 1985, p.27-41

5. Ilan Halevi: Zionism Today; Arab Studies Quarterly, Spring/Summer
1985, p.3-10

6. Roselle Tekiner: Jewish Nationality Status as the Basis for
Institutionalized Racism in Israel. The International Organisation for
the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (EAFORD),
Washington, 1985

7. Dr. W. Mallison and Sally V. Mallison: The Zionist
Organization/Jewish Agency in International and US Law, in Judaism or
Zionism - What Difference for the Middle East; Zed Books Ltd., London
1986

8. John Quigley: Palestine and Israel - A Challenge to Justice; Duke
University Press, Durham, N.C., 1991

9. Dr. Uri Davis: Israel's Zionist Society - Consequences for Internal
Opposition and the Necessity for External Intervention; in Judaism or
Zionism - What Difference for the Middle East; Zed Books Ltd., London
1986 top of page



To: Neocon who wrote (2602)4/8/1999 12:45:00 AM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
"The charges and counter- charges from the '48 war should not obscure that it has never been official Israeli policy to get rid of Arabs, either from Israel or in the occupied territories, and the
one political party that did advocate such measures was declared illegal. "

I think this statement is clearly false and I would like provide the follwing article to refute its inaccuracy.
While there are some similarities between the Ethnic cleansing occuring in Kosovo and the Ethnic cleansing that has been occuring in Israel for the last fifty years, there is also a vast difference.
The Palestinian people have lived in Palestine for many centuries if not millennium, while the majority of the Zionist Jews immigrated into palestine in the last 40 years.
The Serbian Christians, on the other, have lived in Serbia for over two thousand years while the Moslems Kosovars only recently immigrated into Kosovo.
I hope the following article will help clarify the Zionist Ethnic Cleanising that has been occuring in Israel for the last fifty years.

APARTHEID LAWS IN ISRAEL - THE ART OF OBSUCATORY FORMULATION

Excerpts from an article by Uzi Ornan, published the Israeli daily Ha'aretz 17 May 1991 ( Hebrew )

It is impossible to turn one's back on reality and deny that the State of Israel is not, likewise, an
Apartheid
state, and that as a result of this, Israeli democracy - which all its leaders and political pundits swear
by -
is being perverted, if not destroyed. This Apartheid has been entrenched in a system of laws,
regulations
and practices which govern the operation of state institutions. What characterizes most of those
discriminatory laws that have been legislated in various Knesset is that on the surface, they do not
appear
to be discriminatory. However, a more in-depth analysis of some of the basic ones quickly reveals
the
extent to which they discriminate between "Jews" and "non-Jews". By studying them one cannot fail
to
reach a conclusion, which cannot but be embarrassing to many of us: namely, that Israel is an
Apartheid
state, and the Apartheid not only manifests itself socially, but that it is also embedded in the legal
system.
The following is devoted to a few of these laws.

The 1952 Law of Entry into Israel was apparently legislated simply to regulate entry into the country.
However, all its clauses, save the one making it obligatory to enter by way of an official border
control
point, are intended to make a clear distinction between foreign citizens who are Jewish and those
who are
not. Yet the words "Jew" and "non-Jew" do not appear. So it is, for instance, that the law stipulates
that
whoever "does not hold an immigration visa or immigration certificate" can be immediately deported
by
the minister of the Interior, or, can be denied a visa at any time. As for the explanation and definition
of
who qualifies for an immigration visa, one must seek the answer in another law, the Law of Return.
The
answer is: Jews.

However, the authority vested in the minister of the Interior to deny entry to foreign citizens if there is
reason to suspect they may harm the public is only applicable to non-Jews. The minister of the
Interior
does not have the authority to deny any Jew - even if he's a scoundrel of the first order who can be
counted on to do harm - the right to settle in Israel. The reason: Jews do not need permits to settle in
Israel....Jews arriving in Israel from abroad are almost immediately given all the rights and privileges
that
Israeli Jews enjoy....Furthermore, they immediately acquire the right to vote in elections and to be
elected
to the Knesset - even if they do not speak a word of Hebrew.

While the minister of the Interior has the authority - albeit, authority which cannot be exercised
without
great difficulties - to deny "immigration visas" to Jews, once a Jew enters the country, the minister of
Interior cannot do anything about it, and does not even have the authority to withdraw residence
permits
from undesirables. In regard to non-Jews, the situation is quite different: the minister of the Interior
can
withdraw their permits even if they have been living here for years. We have witnessed how swindlers
and
common criminals have succeeded in receiving Israeli citizenship, not to mention those who even
managed to get themselves elected to the Knesset. It wasn't the Law of Return that allowed them to
do
so, it was the law governing entry to Israel, which in turn is based on the Citizenship laws of 1952.

The Citizenship Laws of 1952 are a pinnacle in the annals of the art of obfuscation. Even though the
word "Jew" is not mentioned at all in these laws, it is, in its entirety, based on the distinction between
"Jews" and "non-Jews". This is one of the pillars of the Israel Apartheid regime, alongside a plethora
of
other laws, regulations and practices, for "Jews" and "non-Jews". They include: the educational
system;
the regulations of the Israel Lands Authority (which sees to maintaining segregation on the ground);
and
the religious marriage laws, which do not exist in conjunction with civil marriage laws.

(...)

Like in every state, a foreign citizen who wishes to become a citizen of Israel can do so, and the
regulations governing his acquisition of citizenship are similar to those which exist in many other
countries. The basic condition is that candidates must have resided in Israel for a number of years.
Likewise, before citizenship is granted, the candidate must pledge his allegiance to the State of Israel.
In
contrast, Jews are not required to swear a pledge of allegiance to the State of Israel. So it is that a
Satmar
Hassid, who has the utmost contempt for the existence of the state, and perhaps even translates this
into
action, can immediately become a citizen, with the right to vote in Knesset elections.... Moreover,
only
["Jews"]have the right to retain their former citizenship even after becoming Israeli citizens, while
"non-Jews" are obliged to renounce it before becoming Israeli citizens.

The obfuscation does not end here. Take for instance the regulations governing the "joint authority of
the
Israel government and the Jewish Agency". These regulations are discussed as though they were
applicable to all Israeli citizens. But when one reads them through, it quickly becomes apparent that
rights granted to "returning residents" are meant solely for Jews: those who are not Jews have to pay
full
duty on all the articles they transport from the place of residence abroad, and are not granted any
housing
or education benefits upon returning to the country, after, perhaps, a few years of study abroad....

Blatant discrimination against non-Jews can also be found in other laws dealing with the acquisition of
property, government support for young couples, educational curricula, and government expenditure
for
schools, to cite just a few examples. The routine means for enforcing discrimination is the ID card,
which
everyone is obliged to carry at all times. ID cards list "nationality", which can be Jewish, Arab, Druze,
Circassian, Samaritan, Kara'ite, or foreign. When a person presents his ID card to a policeman, a
security
official, or to a clerk at a government office whose services he requires, they can know which
"sector" he
belongs to and treat him accordingly, or, refer him to those who are responsible for dealing with his
"sector". Up to now all the attempts to force the minister of the Interior to also accept the entry of
"Israeli" nationality have failed. Those who have attempted to do so have received a letter from the
ministry of the Interior. While the letterhead is one of the "State of Israel", the letter states that "it was
decided not to recognize an Israeli nationality". By the way, every person has the right to demand that
the
nationality entry in their ID remain blank, and the ministry of the Interior must honor this demand.

Another law, the 1986 Military Service Law, which superficially does not appear to be
discriminatory in
any way, is, by dint of the wily formula used in conjunction with the "nationality" entry in the census, a
destructive tool of discrimination and oppression. The term "draftee" which appears therein applies to
every Israeli citizen or permanent resident, as does the term "candidate for military conscription". In
other
words, a "draftee" - i.e. , someone who has not yet reported to the draft board - is a universal term
and
equally applicable to all citizens. How is it then, that this law has become a major tool for
implementing
discriminatory policies ? The answer is: by the way of a simple and at first glance innocent ploy. It
appears in section three, which deals with how citizens are to be called to report for military service:
a
special person is appointed to be "the enumerator"; his job is to call draftees to register with the draft
board and he "is authorized to order draftees and candidates for conscription to report [to the draft
board]". The law uses the term "authorized", and in so doing leaves open the possibility for the
enumerator to abstain from calling on "draftees" to report. And it is clear that those who the
enumerator
does not call do not have to report, and are therefore exempt from army service. In practice it is
much
simpler: those whose IDs list them as belonging to the "Arab sector" are not called by the
enumerator.

Why are Arab teenagers not called to serve in the army ? The two reasons usually given are nothing
more
than a pretext. The "moral" reasons runs as follows: How can an Arab be asked to fight against his
brother ? This ignores something we have witnessed more than once, namely, that Arabs kill other
Arabs
- whether in terrorist attacks or on the battlefield...The same could apply to Israeli citizens, be they
Arab
of other non-Jews, if they were to feel that their induction into the Israeli Army was justified. But this
will
only come about when they feel themselves equal citizens, and that the state of Israel is protecting
them,
and respecting their rights, treating them no differently than other citizens....It would be pointless to
waste much time on the second reason - "for reasons or security". Both Jews and non-Jews have
been
exposed as spies and traitors. Indeed, there is ample reason to believe that the ones who were the
most
dangerous were Jews. In the same way that being a "Jew" does not vouchsafe automatic loyalty to
Israel,
the label "Arab" is, likewise, not a means of identifying those ready to commit treason or engage in
espionage.

Once a citizen has not been called on to report by the enumerator, discrimination and persecution
follow.
Such is the lot of those [of non-Jews] who do not serve in the army. Many places of employment and
residence become off limits, as the demands of employment and regulations governing the leasing of
homes or lands in the hands of various public and governmental bodies stipulate that candidates must
be
"draftees". So it is, for instance, that Mohammed Borkan did not succeed in remaining in his flat in the
Old City of Jerusalem. One of the basic conditions for being allowed to lease the flats (which were
expropriated for the "public good") is that the leasee must be a "draftee". Take note: the term
"draftee"
also applies to yeshiva students [students of Jewish theology] who have not served in the army. The
enumerator does call on them to report, and that is enough for them to be included in the category of
those who have privileges, even if their contact with the army ends at this point.

One can list many more Apartheid laws, but we will stop at this point....The Apartheid mindset has
always been part and parcel of Judaism. Take for example the age of Ezra and Nehemia (ca.
450-430
BC). All the restrictions and rules incorporated into the Jewish religion were intended to preserve the
purity of the strain against contamination from the Gentiles....Apartheid is so powerful a mindset in
this
society, that its existence and preservation is championed by all the members of the "Zionist parties",
including those who believe themselves to be in the vanguard of the struggle for socialism, peace and
equal rights. We have yet to hear them speak out against the existence of two categories of citizens,
or in
favor of a comprehensive Israeli school system, or in favor of the abolition of restrictions on where
Jews
and Arabs are allowed to live. One gets the impression that their energetic struggle for the
establishment
of a Palestinian state and their vocal opposition to Jewish "settlements" on the other side of the green
line
is based on their desire to preserve a "Jewish state", something which allows and, in the eyes of many
of
them, even justifies the retention of discriminatory laws, and the privileges granted to the Jews.

Everyone who supports democracy and is concerned about the future of Israel, should place the
abolition
of the Apartheid regime that exists here at the top of his list of priorities. And not only leftists, but also
those with liberal views on the right. Those who say we must be ready to "give up a lot for the sake
of
peace" should to so in good faith: abolish Israel's Apartheid laws and grant non-Jewish resident (sic)
the
ability to identify fully with the state. top of page