Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (23211)	4/8/1999 11:47:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

Microsoft Plans an Upgrade of Windows 98 nytimes.com On that subject, there was this somewhat confused article in today's NYT. First, the amusing part: Microsoft will ship an upgraded version of Windows 98 next year because of delays in developing a consumer version of its Windows 2000 system, the company said Wednesday. Microsoft's president, Steven Ballmer, told the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference in Los Angeles that the upgrade would be called Consumer Windows for 2000 and would be aimed at the home-networking market, helping users link personal computers, printers, digital cameras and other devices. Microsoft had planned to supersede Windows 98 with a consumer version of Windows 2000, an operating system for corporate users that is scheduled to be shipped in the second half of this year as a successor to Windows NT. So, because of the slippage in the "consumer" version of the OS formerly known as NT2K, not to mention the non-consumer version of the self-same OS, there will be a "new" Windows 9x. And, so as not to confuse things with the new "Windows 2000" moniker for NT, it will be called "Consumer Windows for 2000". I think the neologistics department is showing signs of stress these days. Anyway, on to the "open source" issue: Brian Valentine, Microsoft's vice president for Windows 2000, also told the Los Angeles conference that Microsoft was considering making its computer source code more freely available. Microsoft has studied the issue over the last six months and is "seriously considering looking at doing open source," a policy of making code available to promote faster and better development by programmers, Mr. Valentine said. "I don't have a problem with putting the Windows code out there," he added. Well, "more freely" needs clarification. As I've mentioned before, the antitrust remedy "forced licensing" is nothing at all like "open source" in the FSF/Linux sense, and I wouldn't hold my breath on the above trial balloonage either. As Stallman said, "Think free speech, not free beer." Maybe Microsoft will set the Win9x source free once Win9x is officially declared dead, or whatever. Like antitrust remedies, it's all way too hypothetical for me until something concrete happens. Cheers, Dan.

To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (23211)	4/26/1999 4:48:00 PM
From: Thure Meyer	Respond to of 24154

Gerald, Picked this from wired.com wired.com An initiative to model the MS vs. DOJ case. " Open Source in Open Court - by Heidi Kriz 3:00 a.m. 26.Apr.99.PDT Picture this: Microsoft's crack legal team invests countless hours and dollars perfecting a legal strategy to counter the US government's antitrust charges. Then, just weeks before the case goes to trial, the company details its plan in a full-page ad in The New York Times. Insanity? Perhaps. But that's exactly the kind of legal strategy that Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig feels his profession should pursue in certain judicial cases. Taking a page from the open-source software movement, Lessig is out to turn the traditionally adversarial and secretive world of the legal system on its head. "We're testing the idea that the sort of 'parallel processing' that goes on in open-source software development can be used effectively, in some cases, in developing a legal argument," said Lessig. Lessig's new model -- called open law -- is an effort to infuse appropriate cases with the same spirit of cooperation and good will that built critical Internet plumbing software, such as Linux, Apache, and SendMail. Lessig is testing the approach with Eldred v. Reno -- a challenge to the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act. Passed in October, the law extends to 70 years the copyright protection that for most works used to be valid until 50 years after the author's death... "" I goes on. I don't know what to think about this. Thure