SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (41884)4/8/1999 1:31:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
In the context of an overt act, you are absolutely right. However, in a separate context, where those atrocities are a historical given and our position in the world power hierarchy is one of responsibility, Clinton's deeds, misdeeds and malfeasance are as hideous. His constantly putting his ego above people's well-being is a crime that will haunt us for several decades.



To: Neocon who wrote (41884)4/8/1999 3:20:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<NATO briefers have admitted that their air attacks -- already adversely affected by weather and terrain in Kosovo -- would be vastly complicated if they had to contend with civilians clustered around potential targets.>>

Here is the problem: Milosovich has ordered the Refugies back from the border. They are returning home. Now what? We are in a similar predicament we were put in with the sanctions against Iraq. We told him to stop ejecting ethnic Albanians and allow them to begin to return or we'd continue bombing. He's allowing them to return, we want to continue bombing but how can we do that with the dadgum ethnic Albanians running around in our way.

In Iraq we told Saddam that he must cooperate with us or we would impose sanctions that would, did, and continue to take Iraqi lives. In reality we did not want Saddam Hussein to cooperate because if he did then we would have no vehicle to continue the UN inspections. Once that became ingrained everything crumbled. A decade later, with hundreds of thousands of innocent dead villagers on our hands we still impose sanctions and have no access to inspect Saddam's facilities.




To: Neocon who wrote (41884)4/9/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Neocon, I was going to give you two points for this one, but given the follow-on dialog with the esteemed Mr. Vaughn, that seems inappropriate. Reasonable indeed, when you're professional and non-partisan, and you professionally, non-partisanly love Ronald Reagan and hate Bill Clinton. Oh, excuse me, you despise, hate is beneath your intellectual dignity.

I'll address the esteemed Mr. Vaughn directly on this one.