Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nuke44 who wrote (2771)	4/8/1999 2:31:00 PM
From: Emile Vidrine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17770

"This is the last time I explain this. Greece will be involved in armed conflict with Macedonia and/or Albania within the next two years, if an abrupt halt isn't called to the spreading conflict in the Balkans." The American aggression against Serbia is strengthening the Moslem and Albanian and will eventually produce and expanded Moslem Albania. Greater Albania will then move on Macedonia (30-40 % Moslem). The KLA and some Albanian leaders haave already expressed this in their vision of a greater Albania. Their goal is create a Moslem powerhouse in the midst of Europe. This will bring Greece into the war and then Turkey will attack Greece. WWIII.. America is guranteeing this scenario by destabilizing the region with its bombings and at the same time encouraging the Moslem expansion in Europe.

To: nuke44 who wrote (2771)	4/8/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

This is the last time I explain this. Greece will be involved in armed conflict with Macedonia and/or Albania within the next two years, if an abrupt halt isn't called to the spreading conflict in the Balkans. Then let Greece ask NATO for help. Greece, which you cite as the only endangered NATO country, is the NATO country most OPPOSED to this campaign. NATO is a DEFENSIVE alliance. Greece is entitled to call on it if it believes it justified. Greece has not done so and, so far as I can tell, has no intention or desire of doing so. So that isn't a justification for the NATO bombing. Next case?

To: nuke44 who wrote (2771)	4/8/1999 3:26:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Respond to of 17770

>>As far as your continous cutesy references of Viet Nam as a civil war, that's a term that would only be used by someone who wasn't there and didn't face the onslaught of a hostile invading army. << I guess that's what happens when you crash somebody else's party. Exactly what silly shit have "we" been "putting up" with from Yugsolavia? The same type of silly shit the Chinese dish out? bp

To: nuke44 who wrote (2771)	4/8/1999 3:46:00 PM
From: Emile Vidrine	Respond to of 17770

" I say we've put up with their silly shit for long enough. Since they won't put an end to it, we (NATO) should." The US-NATO terrorist aggression against the Serbian Orthodox Christians is not putting and end to the conflict, but rather exciting the Moslems to expand their offensive in Europe. Emile

To: nuke44 who wrote (2771)	4/8/1999 11:27:00 PM
From: George Papadopoulos	Respond to of 17770

>Greece will be involved in armed conflict with Macedonia and/or Albania within the next two years, if an abrupt halt isn't called to the spreading conflict in the Balkans. Abrupt halt....let's do that... The bottom line is that the bombing made the fear of "spreading conflict" closer to reality. >Greece is only waiting for the conflicts to reach it's borders before "responding to Albanian and Macedonian agression". Well, the bombing has brought the coflict closer, that's for sure. As far as Greece having aggressive territorial intentions that is baloney! Greeks are love minded always but will fight to death if any country attacks and threatens their sovereignty and dignity (just like the Serbs are doing). I am proud to have Greek blood in me because Greeks are the only people who have stood by the Serbs. Greeks believe what NATO is ding is criminally wrong and blatant aggression which threatens world and Balkan stability gravely! >(Hell Greece was willing to go to war with Macedonia because of it's name. Come on, we would not go to war for just a name, are you serious? We will just cut off the borders and let them become another Albania. If they did not have the trade ties with Greece, that country will not exist. As far as the name goes, Greeks still do not like to have an independent country call itself Macedonia, which is a Greek province, has been for ages....here we go another Balkan story. >Greece claims proprietary control of the name "Macedonia" Sure it has been patented by Greeks! >Greece is fully aware that Turkey would come to the aid of Muslims in Macedonia and Albania at the drop of a hat Strategically, being surrounded by nations friendly to Turkey is not in Greece's interests...Duh! > but their hate for the Turks has created a blind spot in their collective national sight hate? dislike maybe, but not hate...people are people, it's the governments that get to play off this nationalistic crap (hmm, sounds familiar?)...We would like Turkey to stop ILLEGALLY (see that word has no meaning anymore) occupying Cyprus and stop grambling about the internationally accepted borders in Aegean...that's all. >and also causes them to forget that Turkey has ripped them a new asshole every time they've traded punches since Greece obtained independence from the Ottoman Empire. Oooh nuky boy...if I could go back further I am sure I would win this one...But as long as we got the veto power of who gets in the EU Greece will be fine. >A shooting war between Greece and Turkey would make every thing that has happened in the Balkans to date look like schoolyard fistfight. Hmm, two NATO members going at it.....oh gosh this gets very confusing, will NATO come to intervene, the US, the Arab League or what?