Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Claude Resources TSE.CRJ Undervalued Junior Gold Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick W. who wrote (189)	4/8/1999 8:20:00 PM
From: Enigma	Respond to of 359

Yes - I have noticed that they have used $325 fairly consistently. I don't know why. dd

To: Rick W. who wrote (189)	4/8/1999 10:27:00 PM
From: Terence Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 359

Hi, Did it occur to anyone that what they were really saying was, we are using $325 as a cutoff as a minimum price of gold to render the gold content "worth" mining. (ie, as opposed to ozs/ton) I always thought that the definition of a resource was "can you sell it for more than the cost of producing it" I don't have a problem with this definition at all, or is it my 40 years mining experience that is missing something here ??? regards, Terence M