Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearded One who wrote (20059)	4/8/1999 4:07:00 PM
From: RTev	Respond to of 74651

I believe the reason that the Windows 98 product line will continue is that Microsoft cannot get Windows 2000 to work correctly. I agree. There's no other reason to give up on a long-announced plan. Microsoft has been telling developers for years that they should focus on NT because that's the future. Many have spent a lot of money making their programs NT compatible even though the market for NT applications is fairly small. Some developers could have ignored NT and accepted bugs there since the big market was in consumer Windows, but Microsoft told them they shouldn't (and couldn't if they wanted a Windows sticker) do that because even the desktop would soon belong to NT. I suspect a few of them are now asking themselves why they listened. It's expensive even for biggest app-maker of them all, Microsoft itself. Applications must now be developed for and tested on at least three different versions of Windows -- NT4, Win2000, and Windows 98. It will take longer and cost more to get an application out the door because the developer will be faced with the challenge of making code work on two systems that are significantly different in too many ways. It becomes a particular problem when a developer wants to take advantage of new features in Windows2000 but still needs to sell into the desktop market to be dominated for years to come by Windows98. Microsoft knows the costs adding testers to handle multiple OSes. They know the statistics on compatibility bugs. If they could make a consumer OS based on the NT kernel, I'm pretty sure they would. We should all hope that they would not accept that extra cost and dilution of earnings of the double-OS strategy merely as a legal ploy.

To: Bearded One who wrote (20059)	4/8/1999 5:40:00 PM
From: DownSouth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Excluding Cisco, which made their deal years ago, can anyone name a company which has stated that they will use Active Directory in their products? LOL! Excluding Cisco? Why would you exclude the dominant network provider from your discussion? What's the point? And what does the fact that SUNW is reselling NDS have to do with anything? Do you think they would resell MSFT? Heck no. They gotta sell something, and NDS is the only option they have.