Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jenna who wrote (31998)	4/8/1999 8:36:00 PM
From: Jenna	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 120523

<<MG earnings plays >>INFS+18.38% 200% earnings surprise which is the biggest today gapped up 1 point this morning but had more to go. (expected $0.04 actual $0.12) after close: VNWK earnings surprise (18%) and VTSS earnings surprise record earnings see below INFS: cbs.marketwatch.com VNWK: hursday April 8, 4:02 pm Eastern Time Company Press Release SOURCE: Visual Networks, Inc. Visual Networks Reports Record First Quarter Earnings ROCKVILLE, Md., April 8 /PRNewswire/ -- Visual Networks®, Inc. (Nasdaq: VNWK - news), the leading provider of WAN service level management systems, announces today record financial results for the three months ended March 31, 1999. Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 1999 was $16.8 million compared with $10.3 million for the same period last year, an increase of 63%. Net income for the three months ended March 31, 1999 was $2.8 million or $0.13 per share. The net income for the three months ended March 31, 1999 represents a $3.9 million increase when compared to the net loss of $1.1 million for the same period last year. VTSS:http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/990408/ca_vitesse_1.html

To: Jenna who wrote (31998)	4/9/1999 7:52:00 AM
From: techtome	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 120523

Jenna, <<In some case they are still fundamentally sound, in some cases their fundamentals have deteriorated a bit.>> I have been presuming that all your selections were fundamentally sound as per "beaten-down, fundamentally sound" in the thread intro. Would you mind putting some kind of warning on the ones that you don't consider truly fundamentally sound? I am not experienced enough to deal with those that aren't, not fast enough to check all the fundamentals myself --so many choices! Thanks. Techtome