SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BGR who wrote (55289)4/8/1999 9:15:00 PM
From: Alias Shrugged  Respond to of 132070
 
BGR

"Over-owning"=over-weighted: if "market" is defined as SPX, of which 2% is gold stocks (made up number), and I own 5% gold stocks.

I suspect Mike Burke violently rejects the notion of defining risks in relative terms, and uses a definition of risk rooted in his model of how the real world and the financial world correlate. If he sees that relationship seriously out of whack (as in today's US equity market), he chooses not to be naked long the market as he perceives the risks as too high, even though MPT would see such a position as entailing a "normal" amount of risk.

Seems to me that MPT offers a method of investing in a market ONCE you have decided to be in that market. But, the critical decision is whether or not to be in that particular market.

How do you decide how to allocate your investment dollars among (1) equities (US vs other markets; small versus large; value vs growth); (2) real estate; (3) fixed income; (4) commodities, etc. etc.?

Mike



To: BGR who wrote (55289)4/9/1999 9:22:00 AM
From: Cynic 2005  Respond to of 132070
 
<<(for example, a resident Indian investor cannot invest in the S&P due to legal issues and one probably has to use the Sensex instead in their case). >>
You lost me on this. are you saying Indians living in INdia can not invest in S&P? Or the residents Indians in the USA?