SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mama Bear who wrote (28273)4/9/1999 12:17:00 AM
From: RobbRacer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Mama,
I actually wasn't the one who did the calcs and your points are good ones, but this guide cuts both ways. The calcs assume DLIA has 0 intrinsic value which we all know is not true. That assumption which we know is not true should balance your concerns about taxes, class B shares, and dilution. I pointed this out because I think people are going to blindly short this thing tommorow and the math shows me something different.
Trying to protect the group,
Rob



To: Mama Bear who wrote (28273)4/9/1999 12:28:00 AM
From: Francois Goelo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
Should short sellers include a disclaimer when Company bashing?

It is an interesting and very valid question. I believe that anyone with a vested interest (long or short), commenting (praising or bashing) a particular Company in a way that might affect the market value of its shares, should disclose his/her interest.

Short sellers usually complain that investors heaping praises on the merit of certain Companies, don't include a disclaimer disclosing their position or interest. That's a fair comment, but it should work both ways, in all fairness. Below is the standard disclaimer I usually include whenever I comment on the perceived value of a Company:

Disclaimer: I am not an investment advisor and am not compensated whatsoever by any of the companies on which I report my opinion. This opinion is for my sole use and potential investor should do extensive Due Diligence before taking long or short positions in any stock. My projections could be way off, as I am biased in favour of xxxx Company, since I currently own xxxxx of its shares.

Here is an idea for a typical short seller's disclaimer:

"I am not an investment advisor and am not compensated whatsoever by any of the companies on which I report my opinion. I am bashing this Company for a simple motive: bring its stock down, so that I can profit from my short position. Do your due Diligence and don't believe a thing I say, as I am very biased against this Company since I am short xxxxx number of shares" There could be other variations on the same theme, of course.

Wouldn't this world be a nicer place to live if we all respected a small number of basic, gentle/wo/manly rules of fairness to all concerned?

BTW, I am glad Flodyie is coming back, as he left some unfinished work on the SFLK thread and I would like to buy some inexpensive shares before it bounces back up. Please, see my last post about him:

Message 8750256

Regards, F. Goelo + + +