SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mark silvers who wrote (3019)4/9/1999 3:35:00 PM
From: chaosad  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17770
 
Your opinions of me are irrelevant. I am not paranoid. I am racially aware.

You probably view miscegenation and racial cross-breeding as a sign of a healthy society.



To: mark silvers who wrote (3019)4/10/1999 10:33:00 AM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
""Most people that I have run into who are concerned about bloodlines are either dog breeders, or people who have no accomplishments of their own to stand on."

I would say that Netanyahu, Golda Meir, Perez, Begin, Dayan etc. etc. are accomplished and they are the sametime VERY concerned, even obsessed, with "bloolines." In fact, the very raison etre of the Israeli state and Zionism is foudned upon the principle of "bloodline". The Israeli Law of Return is based on "bloodlines". I never hear Mark Silvers complain about the extreme racism and bloodline mania preached by Judaism and Israel, but Mark Silvers is quick to criticize bloodlines mania in other people, particularly white Christians like Chaosad. Why is that Mark? Why do you support and approve of a religion like Judaism and a fascist political movement like Zionism that are both based on bloodlines, but condemn Chaosad's desire to preserve his white Christian bloodline?

Why Mark? The answer is very simple. Since you are Jewish and support and sympathize with Zionism, it seems natural for you to defend your own philosophical beliefs. Why not allow Chaosad to support and defend his without acting as if you have a higher moral standard?
Suppose white Christians of Chaosad's belief were to set up a country on the principle that only European Christians had the right to immigrate to it and become citizens? Every Euro-person in the world would simply have to set foot in that country and they would automatically become a citizen--a law modeled after the Israeli Law of Return. In other words, a country setup for the express purpose of perpetuating and defending the white Christian race. Would that country be considered a racist and fascist country? I think we would all agree that it would. Then why don't we all agree that Israel is a
racist and fascist country.
Simply because the news media, network TV, Hollywood and dispensationalist Christians have, over the last several decades, imposed a dual standard upon our thinking. Jews are "holy" and "special" and do not have to follow the same rules as other nationalities and religions.



To: mark silvers who wrote (3019)4/10/1999 10:47:00 AM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17770
 
"Again, you are wrong. Most of us with a sense of compassion look on any people(white ,black, jew, gentile) as a human beings and an individuals."

Do the Zionist Israelis have "sense of compassion, Mark?
Why don't the Zionist leaders and their Jewish supporters in America
begin to "look on any people (white, black, Jew, gentile) as simply human beings and as individuals" and overturn the racist Law of Return and the dozens of other laws that discriminate against non-Jews?
When you say most people, do you exclude the Jews and Zionist because they are special?
If the Zionist in Israel would follow your advice to Chaosad and apply it to the Palestinians, there could be peace in the Middle East and maybe Americans could start paying less taxes by keeping the $7 billion dollars they send to Israel annually.