Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ftmp who wrote (24270)	4/9/1999 7:55:00 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77397

Don't you understand, ftmp, that because CPQ, HWP, & IBM combined have more earnings than Cisco, I would certainly make more money in their stocks than holding Cisco's worthless piece of dung they call a stock that has only returned me a measely 325% gain in 2 years? Never mind the fact that Compaq more often misses earnings than not, HP has so many problems they've split the company into 3 parts to try to spark growth again, and IBM is such a hulking behemoth it has to struggle to keep revenues from declining. I mean get with the program. We're talking about PEs here. Certainly, the low PEs that my favorite trio sport can only mean they are a bargain and should be valued higher. Certainly, Cisco's gastronomically high PE means that the company is about to go bankrupt, implode, and the shares become worthless. Does none of this make sense to you? What part of loony do you not understand? WA WA WAA WAAH! AIMILTO (All In My Institutionalized Loony Tunes Opinion). _____ OK. Based on the above rantings, who am I? This is a tough one, so the correct guessor gets three cheers.