SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ruyi who wrote (18427)4/9/1999 6:28:00 PM
From: Golden Domer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37507
 
Dougie, either you made a mistake with the number of the amendment ... (you're post indicated '2'), or you made a mistake in indicating the date of the amendment (your post indicated '4/9/99'). Either way, it was your mistake, and nobody else's.



To: Ruyi who wrote (18427)4/9/1999 6:30:00 PM
From: CBurnett  Respond to of 37507
 
So whats the neagative news today?



To: Ruyi who wrote (18427)4/9/1999 6:32:00 PM
From: Golden Domer  Respond to of 37507
 
It also "clearly" said 4/9/99
You obviously were trying to stir the pot. Otherwise, why would you bring up an amendment that was filed 2 days ago, and that which was the subject of a number of comments about a thousand posts ago?



To: Ruyi who wrote (18427)4/9/1999 6:33:00 PM
From: WhatsUpWithThat  Respond to of 37507
 
You're not making yourself clear. Are you saying, unambiguously:

1. there are 3 amendments, the third of which is the auditors' report, filed today at 3:05pm

2. there are 2 amendments, the second of which is the auditor's report, filed today at 3:05pm...which means everyone else dreamed up the 2nd amendment that was much discussed earlier this week

3. there are 2 amendments, the second of which IS the one that was much discussed earlier this week, and your mention of the auditors' report is unconnected - which is confusing at best and misleading at worst

4. you just enjoy messing with everyone's mind, seeing how much you can stir things up

One of these, answers 1 through 4, would clear things allllll up, Doug.

EDIT: Just read your reply to someone else, from which it appears it's a bit of 3 and a bit of 4

WUWT



To: Ruyi who wrote (18427)4/9/1999 6:43:00 PM
From: SirVinny  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37507
 
Dagan

Your post read as follows:

Bid.Com amendment no.2 20-F 4/9/99 / 3:07:35 PM 223591

This to me is a blatant attempt to present false information in an effort to mislead the reader.

Although I am not someone who enjoys snitching on others and I have never done so before, but I do not see this is as a minor schoolyard prank. Your posts are deliberate and they have great negative impact on some of the readers here. I therefore have no alternative but to report this to SI.

SirVinny