Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (55040)	4/9/1999 9:08:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Respond to of 1572507

Scumbria - <if you are inclined to play those kind of games.> I haven't felt the need to play that way, yet. <G> I agree, one could always accept more risk for the reward of a potentially \large gain. Good luck in these pursuits! PB

To: Scumbria who wrote (55040)	4/9/1999 11:27:00 PM
From: exhon2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572507

scumbria: re >>In August, 1997, INTC was trading at $104. Two weeks ago INTC was trading about $115.<< In 1997, Intel hit a high of 101, (pre-split 202), not 104. re >>It is also easy to pick time frames for AMD where you could have made %100 return, if you are inclined to play those kind of games.<< Heaven knows you are inclined to play those kind of games. You are the meister!!!

To: Scumbria who wrote (55040)	4/10/1999 4:56:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1572507

<In August, 1997, INTC was trading at $104. Two weeks ago INTC was trading about $115.> Scumbria, I'm only going to say this once. Quit it. You've been picking and choosing your price points for a long time now in a very childish attempt to twist the truth. Your credibility is so low at this point that it's amazing you're calling me the rookie. And if you're purposely trying to annoy people or imitate Paul Engel's behavior, well, that shows how even more immature you are. At least Paul knows how to choose winners. Tenchusatsu